Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Iranian Techniques Tested in Iraq

iran-army.jpg

The recent upsurge on mortar attacks against key Iraqi and US government facilities in Baghdad could be partly attributed to Iranian training of insurgents, a top coalition commander said late last week.

Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno told reporters at the Pentagon recent sweeps in Diyala province have netted around 50 “high value” terror suspects, most of whom are Iraqis who’ve joined al Qaeda – and most of those are IED builders and truck/car bomb factory facilitators.

Some, however, are Shiite insurgents who have received training in Iran on mortar techniques.

Odierno explained:

We have found a few people that were Shi'a extremists that were connected to -- that had some training in Iran -- those mostly being the mortar and rocket teams inside of Baghdad where they were trained in Iran and came in here to conduct attacks against not only coalition and Iraqi security forces, but government of Iraq targets inside of the Green Zone.

The attacks on the Green Zone bolster arguments that the Baghdad security plan is a failure, pushing America closer and closer to an early withdrawal. Odierno said Iran is conducting a surge of its own.

I think it's Iran's attempt to continue to destabilize Iraq and inflict as many casualties as they can, frankly, on U.S. forces who are operating in Iraq. ... What I have seen, though, is a steady increase in support to Shi'a extremists. I think they are trying to surge their support to Shi'a extremists. We've seen an increased flow of training to mortar teams and rocket teams, we've seen an increase in some flow of weapons and munitions into Iraq. We are working very hard to cut those lines every day from Iran.

Though Odierno did tamp down accusations that Iran was supplying Sunni groups in Iraq to accomplish the same goal. This, after a top US diplomat in Afghanistan claimed evidence of direct links to Iranian government military shipments to Taliban insurgents.

And he went on to explain the intricate system of cut-outs that help deflect any direct links to the Iranian government’s support and training of Shiite insurgents.

I think it's the Qods Force working with Iraqi surrogates that work inside of Iraq. It's probably in some cases a network that was developed prior to Saddam Hussein's downfall and they continue to operate. And so we watch that extremely closely. We think that's the majority of where it's happening.

I would just say, again, I think some of the reason -- with the operations in Baqubah and Diyala province, we think, we're hoping will affect some of this. We want to put pressure also on that network, of cutting those supplies of weapons that are coming in from Iran. And that's one of the other reasons why we're conducting this operation.

I understand that many DT readers strongly debate the Iranian connection. But Odierno seemed to indicate there would be more concrete information emerging from the latest Diyala sweeps that would be shared with the media to prove out assertions of Iranian complicity in the deaths of Iraqis and US forces.

And I think, you know, we've had some indications of that through some of the people we've detained, and I think in the future here we're going to lay some of that out for you. So I think -- we feel pretty confident about those links.

-- Christian

Comments

For those of you who have never been in Iraq? How the hell would you know....We were catching lots of insurgents moving in and about our AOR being "trained" on the spot by unidentified people, traicing them with ROV to their homes, picking them up and then some officer at a checkpoint not finding any evidence to hold them. Iranians have been using our weak point to bolster and expand their operation deep within Iraq for years.

Posted by: Michael Hank at July 5, 2007 11:59 AM


Training is cheap and portable, and generally hard to track, so it's a good option for increasing "friend's" capabilities. As far as the simplicity of mortaring, are there or are there not different skill levels? If there are, training counts. Duh.

Iran is unquestionably destabilizing Iraq in every way it can; playing both ends against the middle is hardly a stretch. It would be surprising if it didn't do so, actually. Figure Mookie's outburst recently as pique that he's not their only or main proxy there.

Posted by: Brian H at June 28, 2007 10:31 AM


I presume Odierno has some captured Iranian mortarmen he can show the media.

No?

Or some captured Iranian trainers?

How about some mortars that can be traced to Iran?

How about, you know, any evidence at all? Because being fed a line of utter bull about Iraqi weapons by a decorated general* is what got us into this in the first place, so I'm not exactly keen to make the same mistake again. (*That would be Powell.)

Posted by: ajay at June 26, 2007 01:33 PM


"ellis said:
Hey sglover,

With your extraordinary grasp of geography and your super-fast typing skills, you'd be a lock for a job editing a site like this and informing us all of your vaunted opinions. Or a valuable asset to the intelligence community, or even advising the President. So why are you sitting in your basement shrieking at the screen about how unqualified the guys running this website must be? You're reading it. Who's the idiot?"

One is not but a fool for visiting a transferrer of informational access, but one is (a fool) when considering such a thing without the level of prudence being considered "not a fool" warrants.

As far as I know, understanding Iran's aggressive behavior as responsives to perceived threats as something "not evil" is workable. But, understanding it as "not evil" when they wish entire, legitimate parties "wiped off the map" isn't workable.

Posted by: Kniero at June 26, 2007 06:54 AM


Oh those sniper-rifles keep coming back. How about this?

/quote/
In an exclusive to Confederate Yankee, U.S. Army Christopher C. Garver, Director of the Combined Press Information Center for Multinational Corps-Iraq, stated that no such rifles have ever been confirmed recovered by American military forces in Iraq.

"Ever since that article, we have queried our units to see if anyone can find any evidence of those Steyr-Mannlicher sniper rifles," said Garver.

"To date, we have not found one unit that has any knowledge of that find.

"I can't tell you that this didn't happen -- the possibility that the cache of rifles was destroyed before being completely documented does exist, though the chance of that happening is small -- but we have been able to find no evidence of it."
/end-quote/
http://confederateyankee.mu.nu/archives/229882.php

Funny nobody ever saw one of these in Iraq ...

Posted by: b at June 26, 2007 01:08 AM


Look, to all you Clausewitzen talking about how Iran *really is* backing proxies in Iraq, all I can say is, No shit?!?! The point, geniuses, is that Iraq and Iran are neighbors -- geographically, culturally, historically. It's THEIR part of the world, not ours. If we believed that hostile powers were supporting proxies in what we consider our sphere of interest, we'd be doing *exactly* what the Iranians are doing. In fact, we did, in El Salvador and Nicaragua.

So how's about you drop the breathless moral outrage about evil Tehran, unless you enjoy looking stupid, laughable, hypocritical.

Posted by: sglover at June 25, 2007 11:47 PM


Look, to all you Clausewitzen talking about how Iran *really is* backing proxies in Iraq, all I can say is, No shit?!?! The point, geniuses, is that Iraq and Iran are neighbors -- geographically, culturally, historically. It's THEIR part of the world, not ours. If we believed that hostile powers were supporting proxies in what we consider our sphere of interest, we'd be doing *exactly* what the Iranians are doing. In fact, we did, in El Salvador and Nicaragua.

So how's about you drop the breathless moral outrage about evil Tehran, unless you enjoy looking stupid, laughable, hypocritical.

Posted by: sglover at June 25, 2007 11:44 PM


Actually, the sniper rifles DID pan out. We just haven't punished Iran for it.

We still haven't dealt with repeated Iranian incursions into Iraqi territory.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1605487,00.html

Iranian Army units shooting at US Army units in Iraq haven't been dealt with.

Components for the EFP are coming from Iran.

Today the Sun reported that Iranian helicopters are flying into Iraq fairly regularly.

The Iranians tried to seize Australian Navy personnel before British personnel were taken


If you don't think that Iran is fighting a war against the US-you ARE A FOOL.

But we knew that about you Glover. You still think John Kerry would have done a better job.

Posted by: Max at June 25, 2007 07:17 PM


Hey sglover,

With your extraordinary grasp of geography and your super-fast typing skills, you'd be a lock for a job editing a site like this and informing us all of your vaunted opinions. Or a valuable asset to the intelligence community, or even advising the President. So why are you sitting in your basement shrieking at the screen about how unqualified the guys running this website must be? You're reading it. Who's the idiot?

Posted by: ellis at June 25, 2007 04:17 PM


When are we going to get a stream of articles about the involvement of Saudi Arabia and Jordan in the Sunni insurgency and terrorist cells? For instance, two-thirds of the suicide bomb attacks are being carried out by Saudi nationals.

Posted by: Les H at June 25, 2007 03:05 PM


"Iranian tactics"?? Unless the Iranians invented the mortar, it sounds like basic infantry tactics--I see nothing that is uniquely Iranian about a mortar barrage.
The article did mention one important aspect to this situation. These Iranian-Iraqi networks most definitely date back to the Iran-Iraq war, where the Iranians used Shia and even Kurds to undermine the Baathists. Obviously, US intel knows this and is seeking ways to encourage those groups to drop their Iranian relationship in favor of a US one. It would be an interesting article that covered the extent of these relationships and how they have evolved in post-Saddam Iraq.

Posted by: Hoax Meister at June 25, 2007 02:42 PM


The Iranian involvement has been proven time and time again. It's not seriously in doubt. What to do about it is the question. So far we've taken a very restrained approach, which is probably the best course of action at the moment.

Willful ignorance is not a substitute for critical thinking.

Posted by: jim at June 25, 2007 02:39 PM


They were pretty confident about the non-existent WMD in Iraq too.

Those Austrian sniper rifles did not pan out.

EFP facoties have been found in Iraq.

Enough of the allegations: let's see some actual evidence rather than just mud-slinging.

Posted by: Wembley at June 25, 2007 01:23 PM


Whoever runs this site never should have let this yahoo Christian post articles. Still spreading the hysteria, eh boy? For the third time -- I'm going to type this slowly so even you can grasp it -- look at a map of the Iraq vicinity. Then, after you've acquainted yourself with some basic geography, you can report back to us about who has a better claim to try to influence the region, and who's meddling.

Idiot.

Posted by: sglover at June 25, 2007 01:22 PM


As a former Opfor mortar guy at JRTC, once you know where the Q is at, the rest is basic tactics. Shoot from where they are not looking or from the middle of a civilian area. Seat your weapon well and survey your site via GPS. One round to settle the tube second to hit the target. Level the bubbles. Fire for effect 5-10 rounds mixed HE and WP. Pack up and move out.

should take less than 2 minutes from breaking cover to breaking contact.

Takes at least 5 minutes for counter bat to land. 20+ if there is an expert on hand to do crater analysis and no Q tracking.

So much for tactics.

Posted by: joe at June 25, 2007 01:09 PM


Wonder about the title of the post:

"Iranian Techniques Tested in Iraq"

There is nothing in the post about "Iranian technics" or their testing in Iraq.

The only thing is Odierno, without any proof, musing about mortars at the Green Zone by -possivle- Iran supported elements.

There is not much training needed to use a mortar or short range rocket. Why would Iraqis, 100,000 of them kicked out of Saddams old army thanks to Rumsfeld/Bremer, need any training for these at all?

This is again simply hyping an assumed "threat" without any, any proof.

May I see those WMDs again please?

Posted by: b at June 25, 2007 12:50 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.