Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Document Alert

jones-report.jpg

The official report of the Independant Commission on the Security Forces of Iraq, otherwise known as the "Jones Report"

An excerpt:

The Commission finds that in general, the Iraqi Security Forces, military and police, have made uneven progress, but that there should be increasing improvement in both their readiness and their capability to provide for the internal security of Iraq. With regard to external dangers, the evidence indicates that the Iraqi Security Forces will not be able to secure Iraqi borders against conventional military threats in the near term.

While severely deficient in combat support and combat service support capabilities, the new Iraqi armed forces, especially the Army, show clear evidence of developing the baseline infrastructures that lead to the successful formation of a national defense capability. The Commission concurs with the view expressed by U.S., Coalition, and Iraqi experts that the Iraqi Army is capable of taking over an increasing amount of day-to-day combat responsibilities from Coalition forces. In any event, the ISF will be unable to fulfill their essential security responsibilities independently over the next 12-18 months.

In the aggregate, the Commission’s assessment ascribes better progress to the Iraqi Army and the Ministry of Defense and less to the Ministry of Interior, whose dysfunction has hampered the police forces’ ability to achieve the level of effectiveness vital to the security and stability of Iraq.

The Iraqi police are improving at the local level predominantly where the ethnic makeup of the population is relatively homogenous and the police are recruited from the local area. Police forces are hampered by corruption and dysfunction within the Ministry of Interior. In some areas, they have been vulnerable to infiltration, and they are often outmatched in leadership, training, tactics, equipment, and weapons by the terrorists, criminals, and the militias they must combat. The rate of improvement must be accelerated if the Iraqi police are to meet their essential security responsibilities.

-- Christian

Comments

"Iran is the key to the Global War on Terror. The hatred of the West began from Iran and has since spread. Iran is the head of the snake."

Right, and when Cheney wants to bomb Syria, suddenly Syria will become the head of the snake. Anyone *except* the Saudis can be the 'head of the snake.'

Posted by: mike at September 7, 2007 07:58 AM


Illegal invasions and occupation of sovereign countries use to be the preserve of Communists, Nazi's and dictators. But it seems cooking up "intelligence of WMD" is now the acceptable excuse, even in a "democratic country". The USA has opened a hornet's nest, destabilised the middle east and now is wondering why it's young men are dieing to make business men rich.

3000 innocent lives were lost in 911,but American citizens lives obviously are worth more than 150 000 iraqi's killed as a direct result of an illegal invasion of a sovereign country. Not to mention the 40 000 to 50000 Afghan lives lost.

Iran is seen as the great threat to world stability... well if you consider it from the Iranian point of view, the USA and Britain supported and supplied Iraq in a muderous war, that cost 1 milion Iranian lives. The USA and it's allies have just invaded Iran neighbour, would you not be looking for a little strategic safety ? nuclear weapons certainly make the USA think twice about bombing or invading, ask North Korea. Seeing as the USA is the ONLY country to have used nuclear weapons in anger, has invaded 2 sovereign countries in the last 5 years, on a proven false premise, without a world consensus. Who is the great threat to world stability ?

Posted by: Nelson at September 7, 2007 04:07 AM



"Where do you think the heart of Militant Islamic Extremism comes from?"

Let's see: the 9/11 attacks were carried out mainly by Saudis, working for a Saudi terror organization with a Saudi leader.

So I'm guessing Saudi Arabia on this.

Posted by: Wembley at September 7, 2007 03:45 AM


Again, you just want to give up the majority of the 26 million population to Iranian rule? Smart move, another 26 million people that hate democracy and anything associated with Western Civilization (ie, freedom, etc). Thats really going to make the world safer isn't it? Just retreat to Basra so we can keep our Oil, which by the way the top 10 oil companies are making over $125 BILLION in profits.

Maybe we can just protect the North Pole so Santa Claus won't be hindered in his yearly gift giving. Don't forget to protect the tooth fairy. And the Easter Bunny.

Give up on the Oil excuse, it's not our supply that hurts our prices it's our own big oil companies. They will not invest in the refineries therefore we pay way more at the pump because the old refineries are troulesome and inefficient. But why should they change as long as we'll pay for it.

I'm done with this, ignorant people won't try to learn so whats the point.

Posted by: Jeff at September 6, 2007 02:07 PM


heh heh! strike "threats", substitute "acts"

cant even re-read my own post correctly! which supports what I said about people not "READ"ing post. 'n if I cant even read my own, what chance do lesser mortals have?

LOL!

Posted by: campbell at September 6, 2007 01:14 PM


(sigh) it is so tiresome, to repeatedly read posts, from whatever point of view, about any given subject, go back and forth and back and forth...simply because whomever is so adamant about making their own point, that they neglect to READ those made by another...

"...against eventual Iranian threats"

get it?

Posted by: campbell at September 6, 2007 01:10 PM


Campbell,

You just want to leave an unprotect Iraq open to invasion by Iran? Look on the map my friend. Afghanistan is to the East of Iran and Iraq is to the West. Where do you think the heart of Militant Islamic Extremism comes from??? IRAN!!!

Our reasons for going into Iraq are going to be debated for a long time by historians and politicians but we cannot just leave the country to be overran by the Iranians. We allow that to happen and will be in much worse shape than we are now. Why is Iraq so hard to control? Iranian supported militias and insurgents are keeping Iraq from unifying and standing up.

Iran is the key to the Global War on Terror. The hatred of the West began from Iran and has since spread. Iran is the head of the snake.

Posted by: Jeff at September 6, 2007 12:26 PM


and their point is?

approximately 1500 words, to say what we already know. welcome to the wild and wooly world of doublespeak!

wow.

I normaly won't do this, but on the off chance that it may work it's way up topside:

there are two reasons for being involved in Iraq; one, its' oil, two Al Queada. the last is in Afganistan/northern Pakistan, and there is no oil in Bagdad.

Get out of town n let em fight it out on their own... get down to Basra to secure that oil port against enventual Iranian acts, change "force protection" to oil field protection, and concentrate on Afganistan and the Pakistani border.

gee, it's so easy when you focus

Posted by: campbell at September 6, 2007 11:35 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.