Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Building the Drone Hive

uxv.jpg

British-based BAE Systems is proposing a sea-going mother ship for unmanned vehicles (UXV) of various types. A BAE news release sent out a few days ago describes the new warship as “the UXV Combatant, designed to operate in a future battle space dominated by land, sea and air unmanned vehicles. Using a proven naval hull form to launch, operate and recover large numbers of small unmanned vehicles for extended periods, the UXV plays the role of mother ship -- a permanent base and control centre for the futuristic unmanned land, sea and air vehicles...”

An artist’s concept of the 8,000-tonne warship shows a low-observable (stealth) design with two large island structures amidships, recessed missile launchers forward, and a large flight deck area aft for operating Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). The ship’s hull and combat systems will be a development of the Type 45 destroyer.

The first Type 45 destroyer -- HMS Daring -- is now on sea trials. The Royal Navy plans to procure eight of these ships, which have a full-load displacement of some 7,350 tonnes and are 500 feet in length. The gun/missile-armed ship has helicopter facilities.

The UXV support ship, apparently based on an enlarged Type 45 design, will have a lower hangar deck for storing and maintaining UAVs, while the two flight decks will have a variable ski-jump ramp to accelerate the launch of heavily loaded UAVs.

The ship would also support Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUV) and Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USV).

While the Royal Navy has made no commitment to construct such a ship, BAE Systems believes that a UXV support ship could be operational by 2020.

The U.S. Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program that is now underway provides for at least three LCS mission configurations -- anti-surface craft, anti-submarine, and mine countermeasures. All of these configurations will make extensive use of UAVs and, depending upon the configuration, will also operate surface and underwater unmanned vehicles.

The U.S. Navy is also developing a large, carrier-based Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle (UCAV) based on the technology demonstrator designated X-47B. Developed by Northrop Grumman, the UCAV derived from the X-47B will be a multi-mission aircraft with a flying-wing configuration. It will operate from large-deck aircraft carriers. They will operate employing arresting gear and catapults, as do manned aircraft, and they will be integrated into conventional carrier air wings.

But the proposed BAE Systems’ UXV support ship will -- with the U.S. Navy’s LCS program -- be the world’s first specialized ships for operating unmanned vehicles. These will certainly lead to a marked change in the nature of naval operations.

-- Norman Polmar

Comments

If we built some fast container ships, this is just one of the ways we could configure them.

Posted by: demophilus at September 25, 2007 01:11 PM


Hey,we still have the LPH-10 Tripoli above water(meaning that she hasn't been scrapped or sunk, unlike her fellow Iwo Jima sister ships).Oh wait I forgot,using this ship as a carrier for UAVs violates the Military Industrial Complex agreement to waste billions of dollars on future(?) planned(scammed) carriers of this kind.I guess they better hurry up & sink this mother before somebody decides to save money by actually using what we already have.I guess its time to make the Tripoli a new "'artificial' reef."

Posted by: Roy Smith at September 25, 2007 02:21 AM


Im just sad to see computers take over the role Humans should have. No computer is going to match a human. Unmaned recon is one thing, but unmaned combat is quite another. What happens when the terrorist find a way to hijack the ship, when they figure out how to interfear and kill half of New York with our own ship. Unmaned will never be as effective as Manned.

Posted by: 22lr at September 24, 2007 09:02 PM


The argument for this vessel over a role swapped phib is speed basically- that a more capable self defense and potentially C3. The Danish Absalon (or is it Absalom) class is another BAe design with a flexible mission deck.
This design seems to have a pretty extreme flight deck design too- that's a pretty big overhang. The sort of design feature that isn't very easy to build into a very stable or stealthy design.

Posted by: ant at September 24, 2007 02:05 PM


Well I must admit that those WW2 Sea plane tenders do come to mind, but I think this is an excellent idea. One of these ships sailing in accompany of larger carrier type aircraft, freeing up deck space on the "real" carriers for standard aircraft operations.

Pocket Carrier Anyone?
- Phil

Posted by: Philip at September 24, 2007 01:54 PM


Good Morning Guys,

The only response I can think of to this idea is why?

Common sense says that underwater unmanned vehicles would best be served by submarines, stealth anyone. Surface unmanned vessels I would think would do ok being operated from current amphibious warfare ships that already have wet docks.

The UCAV is already destined to be deployed on carriers, Granted a 100Kt. behemouths like the CV-21 Class may not be neccessary for the unmanned air vehicles, something in the 15Kt. size might do just nicely, but that's another dicussion.

This seems to be an idea that died with the old Sea Plane Tenders, anyone for bringing back the U.S.S. Pine Island?

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at September 24, 2007 12:19 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.