Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Secret Service Whoop Ass

Mount a mini-gun on a hard SUV and what do you get? I'm not sure but it sure does have a high rate of fire. Heads up, Code Pink bad people who could be viewed as a threat to state officials . . .

-- Ward

Comments

I want one. Free gas from friendly Shell clerks and no more speeding tickets.

Posted by: Graham Strouse at December 8, 2007 06:18 PM


I'm sure Kiefer Sutherland would love it. On a damped mount with some sights worthy of the name it might have some utility but on a free swinging flex mount like this...not so much.

Posted by: jsallison at December 4, 2007 08:24 PM


You can't fire along the sides without hitting the hatch doors?

Posted by: Rudy at December 2, 2007 12:57 PM


Definitely cool. But, there's absolutely no freaking way that the Secret Service would ever buy something like this. Even if you used this as a defensive weapon, to pull the trigger would require absolutely no regard for innocent life. Only the biggest a-hole could imagine using this to protect a VIP in what I would assume to be an urban enviroment. Cool video, but, I shudder to think anyone actually has this somewhere.

Posted by: steve at December 1, 2007 03:01 PM


I wonder when Ford will unveil their competition. A Bradley turret on an Expedition, maybe?

Posted by: Smith at December 1, 2007 12:30 PM


Code Pink is going down!!!!! Hard

Posted by: CodeBlue at December 1, 2007 11:44 AM


In terms of sheer awesomeness, a pop-up minigun turret is right up there with the rocket-powered chainsaw launcher.

Posted by: TrustButVerify at December 1, 2007 10:27 AM


This vehicle was featured on an episode of Mythbusters recently when the were testing out the myth of how easy it was to shoot fish in a barrel. With this gun it was pretty damn easy. Youtube the clip.

Posted by: Dinirich at December 1, 2007 12:36 AM


Once again, a weapon that looks really freakin' awesome, but has no practical purpose has gotten onto Defensetech

Not that I have any problem with it.

Posted by: Pantera at November 30, 2007 10:46 PM


Ward... Are you positive this is for the secret service and not something else like citanon stated??

Posted by: Mike at November 30, 2007 09:10 PM


This is just the thing if you are a terrorist who wants to mow down crowds of innocent people in marketplces. But, when in the world would there be a legitimate use for this thing?

In any situation when you contemplate needing that kind of firepower, which presumably would involve large numbers of armed hostiles, a far better armored vehicle would be de rigeur. You might as well put a 105mm gun on Yugo.

Posted by: ohwilleke at November 30, 2007 06:30 PM


I dunno man, joking about shootin' women is pretty weak. Weak like clear piss.

P.S. yes, I wish I had an SUV with a minigun in the roof.

Posted by: mang at November 30, 2007 05:31 PM



This video was in Danger Room a few months back -

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/08/bond-style-fire.html

- turns out Lawrence Livermore are buying (but not necessarily the fancy pop-up version)

Posted by: Wembley at November 30, 2007 01:35 PM


"Ward's sure got his threat hierarchy straight... pathetic."


Hey Mike, maybe we can get your head removed from your a$$ and have a sense of humor installed in it's place.

Posted by: Steven at November 30, 2007 01:31 PM


these folks watched WAY too much A-Team back in the day

Posted by: C at November 30, 2007 12:23 PM


"Heads up, Code Pink . . ."

Ward's sure got his threat hierarchy straight... pathetic.

Posted by: mike at November 30, 2007 11:11 AM


I'm holding off until they have the CROWS version available next year.

Posted by: nb at November 30, 2007 10:03 AM


I live in Detroit, the city where the weak are killed and eaten. I recently purchased three of these to assist in my daily commute to and from the 'burbs for work. Amazing... simply amazing... what this device does for tailgaters who always seem to think the car ahead is too slow.And talk about clearing a lot so you can find parking!! By the way, I'm paying for these through the funds acquired by renting it to Santa.

Posted by: BacSi duMorte at November 30, 2007 07:09 AM


I believe this is for security at one of the national labs, not the secret service.

Posted by: citanon at November 30, 2007 04:41 AM


This is really old. I saw it years ago. I don't remember where, but I'm sure of it.

Posted by: Kaltes at November 30, 2007 01:07 AM


"Pff, whatever, Mr. Ward. No need to be a dipshit."

It's all he knows.

Posted by: sglover at November 30, 2007 12:29 AM


"Heads up, Code Pink . . ."

Pff, whatever, Mr. Ward. No need to be a dipshit.

Posted by: mang at November 29, 2007 11:17 PM


+1 22lr..... +1

Forget intentional fire.... now Blackwater can blame their excessive fire rates for civilian casualties.

Posted by: Foreign.Boy at November 29, 2007 11:02 PM


Those shell casings are gonna scratch the hell out of the paint on the roof.

Posted by: Brian at November 29, 2007 10:59 PM


Does that come standard?

Posted by: Joe Lagasse at November 29, 2007 06:59 PM


Dont forget a few .30s mounted under the hood, and maybe a few rockets could pop out on side launchers.
Blackwater would just kill more civies with a vehicle like this, they can hold there fire with rifles yet alone a minigun.

Posted by: 22lr at November 29, 2007 06:12 PM


Looks like s fun Sunday driver, but I'd put a Mk-19 in the back hatch, claymores in the bumper, & retractable tazer probes encircling the vehicle... that'd keep those pesky windshield washers away. ;)
Maybe you could mount that Trophy anti-rocket system and mod it into a defensive/offensive system.

Posted by: Camp at November 29, 2007 06:02 PM


Maybe if Blackwater would have had this in Fallujah in 2004 it would have been a different story.

Posted by: Roy Smith at November 29, 2007 05:13 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.