Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Inside a Russian Sub

Here's a rare look inside a Russian sub. Note the Jules Verne vibe surrounding the design -- all the tubes, wires, and pipes. This shows the classic Cold War era Soviet approach to the problem that stands in sharp contrast to the relatively anticeptic look of American submarines. And dig the sound of a million bees buzzing as the torpedoes translate forward.

(Gouge: CM)

-- Ward

Comments

Many people think that Meisha good kill. The sense of aversion to the, No friends (pegged out) and of course there will be no joy. No maple story mesos, you will not feel happy! I just like playing a few career, spent a total of 100 to block it.

Posted by: maple story mesos at August 8, 2008 07:46 PM


Therefore, when I practiced this role, I have also spent much energy and the 2moons gold.

Posted by: 2moons gold at August 6, 2008 03:57 AM


My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

Posted by: Requiem gold at August 6, 2008 03:56 AM



お金借りる
オンラインカジノ
FX初心者
初心者 FX 入門
消費者金融 比較
FX 為替 初心者
外国為替取引
為替取引
FX比較
FX比較
FX 口座開設
FX 資料請求
オンラインカジノ
退職金 資産運用
初心者 FX
FX 口座開設
アンティーク家具
FX 口座開設

Posted by: dfghjk at June 11, 2008 11:05 AM


no wonder they didn't want a physical confrontation with us.

Posted by: yosailor at April 16, 2008 02:31 PM


no wonder they didn't want a physical contact with us.

Posted by: yosailor at April 16, 2008 02:25 PM


nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 14, 2008 10:00 PM


Submarine designs like this are the norm. Pipes, wires, motors etc. are exposed in case damage occurs . Nobody wants to take apart a million panels and screws underwater in a cramped sub during battle, just to repair a pipe.

Posted by: Goodwin at January 30, 2008 08:52 PM


By the way, other than the automated tube doors, that torpedo room looks very similar to other submarines. They all have exposed pipes, valves, electrical, and ductwork.

Posted by: Ex-submariner at January 18, 2008 08:59 PM


One of the early Russian SSN designs had a primary coolant loop routed through crew's mess !

You couldn't pay me to go to sea on a Russian sub.

Posted by: Ex-submariner at January 18, 2008 08:56 PM


A simple Google search on 'russian submarine disaster' has the Russians with 'four lost submarines with many others damaged to reactor accidents, fires, and weapons explosions.'

Posted by: Jack D. Ripper at January 15, 2008 04:18 PM


Ron, in one of the Russians newer tanks, if you're the loader, you must be short, left handed, and quite strong. This smacks of poor human factors design. I worked with a guy who did equipment/design analysis on USSR export equipment. His comment was that everything was oversized, heavy, and while it could be fixed, wasn't up to US military standards. One of the issues is that the USSR/Russians have a different attitude towards equipment design than we do. One of our jet engines is made to last for thousands of hours of flight time. A Russian engine might only last for 500 hrs before scrap out.

Posted by: Jack D. Ripper at January 15, 2008 03:44 PM


I don't know anything about the naves of the worlds. I served in the Army. I do know that the Military tryed to say that the russians were lacking in expertise.that their maintance was poor due to languise problems. exected because of the 9 or 10 languise in that country. that they did not care about their troops.that they were uneducated.so on and so forth. but aparently thats not so. so don't be fooled by apperance's look at the t34 tank of ww2. the allies sherman tank could not stand up to the germans panzers nose to nose.but the t-34 did . don't get me wrong I'm solid american born and bred.there is nothing better then the good old U.S.A.. but don't turn your back on someone you don't know.never under estamate the other guy.

Posted by: ron pond at January 14, 2008 10:48 AM


I am agree with you Jack, but I think most of the radiation contamination cases happened in the early developments of nuclear submarines in the URSS, but I could easily wrong because I don't consulted any data right now. Anyway in this sense I think you are right.

Posted by: Dotomo at January 13, 2008 10:10 AM


As an engineer, my gut feeling when seeing a cluttered piece of equipment is what else is wrong with the design? Making it pretty is a mark of pride in most good engineering.

Posted by: George Skinner at January 13, 2008 01:42 AM


Haven't the Russians traditionally gone for function over form, for the most part. They don't necessarily make pretty but they do make effective.

Posted by: Will Rogers at January 12, 2008 12:08 PM


I don't know about 'antiseptic', but apparently there's enough room to dance in a US torpedo room... though I won't comment on the quality of dancing involved. :)

"Torpedo Room Dance"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=_UpBf1CRri8

Just for fun:

Torp. Misfire
http://youtube.com/watch?v=C_6BhQpjoj0

"29 degrees"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=AGaEHd1QTuI

"Boomer doing Angles and Dangles"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=xrT9SPXWUpg

Seadart Misfire
http://youtube.com/watch?v=m29eTQTm0Ho

Javelin Misfire
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-UXl9PcPvKc

Posted by: Camp at January 11, 2008 04:06 PM


Dotomo, the loss difference may only be one, but how many accidents did the USSR/Russians have on board their subs? How many of their subs were so heavily contaminated by radiation that it was unsafe for their crews? How many near core meltdowns have they had? Their crews are at the mercy of their defense contractors.

Posted by: Jack D. Ripper at January 11, 2008 01:06 PM


If I am not wrong they only lost one submarine more than the US, but if anyone have the time to count here it is a pair of links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_submarine_accidents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lost_Soviet/Russian_submarines
I think that is a partially old submarine.
And Pharsalus, please respect the russian marines (probably victims of their politicians in some or many ways) as we want respect for ours.

Posted by: Dotomo at January 11, 2008 12:10 PM


The major advantage with Russian tech: if you're torpedo is stuck, you can unstick it wit a sledgehammer. Which, maybe, is what the Kursk boys tried ^_^

Still, probably SMC's right, an old Victor I is my guess.

Posted by: Pharsalus at January 11, 2008 10:24 AM


This appears to show them having trouble with the loading problem. Did you notice that while the noise was happening that the torp appeard to be stuck? This is probably an old sub also as they'd be unlikely to let the new tech be shown so casually.

Posted by: smc at January 11, 2008 10:15 AM


They'd never sneak up on anybody unless the pre-load those torpedoes miles away.

Posted by: Armond Leg at January 11, 2008 09:30 AM


Unique, should have video copy sent to History Channel, Discovery Channel & Cong on House Armed services Comm & Senate Armed Services Comms alone.
Give copy to candidates whose Pro defense.
If shot today, we can beat these subs.
Dated sub tech.
No wonder they lose so many subs.

Posted by: stephen russell at January 11, 2008 09:21 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.