Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

KC-X Decision!...Not

tanker-deal.jpg

Friday's the big day, it seems. An insider tells me the decision has been made, but that the memorandum is making its way around the Pentagon to get all the signatures it needs.

Our boy Steve Trimble reports that Northrop Grumman shares went up slightly today while Boeing shares went down (NorGrum is partnered with EADS/Airbus against Boeing). A stock trader buddy of mine (who has no inside knowledge on this contract award at all but it's still a good point nonetheless) says "why do you think the entire military drives Chevy and Ford trucks?" That is to say, there ain't no way a European company will win the bid.

I'm not so sure I agree...But we'll keep you posted.

Tanker Announcement Expected Friday: U.S. Official

WASHINGTON, Feb 27 (Reuters) - The U.S. Air Force's top weapons buyer said on Wednesday her best bet was that the winner of a potential $40 billion refueling aircraft contract would be announced after U.S. markets close on Friday.

"That's my best bet for now," Sue Payton, assistant secretary for acquisition, told Reuters after a hearing of the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee on the Air Force 2009 budget request.

Boeing Co. is vying for the contract against a team made up of Northrop Grumman Corp and Europe's EADS.

"It's absolutely not going to happen today," Payton said. "We're really making sure all the 'i's' are dotted and 't's' are crossed."

Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne earlier told Reuters he hoped an award would be announced "any day now," once the Pentagon's top weapons buyer, John Young, has signed off on he plan to buy 179 tankers, used to extend warplanes' operating range.

"You don't have a decision until all the paperwork is done and complete," Wynne said during a break in testimony to the House panel.

The Air Force presented its acquisition plan on Monday to a top-level panel chaired by Young, the deputy undersecretary for acquisitions. (Reporting by Jim Wolf, editing by Mark Porter)

-- Christian

Comments

Replica A Lange & Sohne
Replica Accutron
Replica Audemars Piguet
Replica Baume & Mercier
Replica Bell & Ross
Replica Breitling
Replica Bvlgari
Replica Cartier
Replica Chanel
Replica Chopard
Replica Christian Bernard
Replica Christian Dior
Replica Citizen
Replica Coach
Replica Concord
Replica Corum
Replica D&G
Replica DKNY
Replica Ebel
Replica ESQ
Replica Fendi
Replica Fila
Replica Franck Muller
Replica Girard Perregaux
Replica Givenchy
Replica Gucci
Replica Guess
Replica Hamilton
Replica Haurex
Replica Invicta
Replica IWC
Replica Jacob & Co
Replica Jacques Lemans
Replica Jaeger LeCoultre
Replica Levis
Replica Longines
Replica Mont Blanc
Replica Movado
Replica Omega
Replica Orient
Replica Oris
Replica Panerai
Replica Patek Philippe
Replica Piaget
Replica Rado
Replica Rolex
Replica Sector
Replica Seiko
Replica Skagen
Replica Swatch
Replica Swiss
Replica Swiss Army Victorinox
Replica Tag Heuer
Replica Technomarine
Replica Timberland
Replica Tissot
Replica Ulysse Nardin
Replica Vacheron Constantin
Replica Wenger
Replica Wittnauer
Replica Zenith
Replica Zodiac ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping
Rolex Sports watches
Rolex Datejusts watches
A Lange & Sohne watches
Aigner watches
Alain Silberstein watches
Audemars Piguet watches
Bell & Ross watches
Breguet watches
Breitling watches
Bvlgari watches
Cartier watches
Chanel watches
Chopard watches
Concord watches
Corum watches
Dior watches
Dolce & Gabbana watches
Ebel watches
Emporio Armani watches
Glashutte watches
Gucci watches
Hermes Watches
IWC watches
Jacob & Co watches
Jaeger LeCoultre watches
Longines watches
Louis Vuitton watches
Mont Blanc watches
Movado watches
Omega watches
Oris watches
Panerai watches
Patek Philippe watches
Philip Stein watches
Porsche Design watches
Rado watches Roger
Roger Dubuis watches
Sarcar watches
Tag Heuer watches
Technomarine watches
Vacheron Constantin watches
Zenith watches ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping
rolex replica-
rolex replica watches-
best replica watches-
watches-
diamond watches-
replica watches-
rolex watches-
watches online-
timex watches-
ladies watch-
luxury watch-
wrist watches-
casio watches-
watches online-
ladies watch-
men's watch-
wrist watches-
replica watches-
fine watches-
casio watches-
watches online-
replica rolex watches-
rolex watch-

Posted by: luxury watch at April 21, 2009 04:19 AM


And you do not think get the cheap SOF gold from me. And I has never trust you. From now on, I only want to choose a new life to live.

Posted by: cheap SOF gold at August 15, 2008 10:37 PM


In fact, you are a despicable and shameless indecency, theses is a saying of the crook is said by the women to eat, I was not addressed to you that first money, I can not give you any money to buy sof gold.

Posted by: buy sof gold at August 15, 2008 10:36 PM


I use my real heart to change for bam, I was so sad, why I always bam by other, if you are real, cost some Scions Of Fate money is not bid thing, I would use the money make me happy.

Posted by: Scions Of Fate money at August 15, 2008 10:35 PM


However I cost my heart again, but what I got. In the game, I cost my all SOF gold to let him happy, if the new equipment has appeared, I cost my all to let you happy, why you can not inspire.

Posted by: SOF gold at August 15, 2008 10:34 PM


And send it to you, when you cost the money, you must very waste. However, you do not think that how way you get the money, and when you waste the money, how could your heart be set free? In the game, you always ask us send the Scions of Fate gold to you.

Posted by: Scions of Fate gold at August 15, 2008 10:33 PM


Northrup has done well with dusting off old designs - they did the same with the B-2, didn't they?

Posted by: az bookkeeping at August 11, 2008 08:45 AM



In fact, we take the risk on the island for what, mesos, what the plan is, is not happy? Of course, you can buy cheap mesos in my game, not blindly upgrading; if training wash your face as its own estimates BOSS can see a mirror.

Posted by: mesos at August 9, 2008 01:09 AM


And then click the warehouse to the elderly, he will give you a bear kill “tooth dental knife” (now seems all levels can carry weapons) so you put on it to “gear teeth knife” after the attacks of a very High upgrade, upgrade it easier and more! (Like the goddess role can not be used) of course definitely need Metin2 money!

Posted by: Metin2 money at August 9, 2008 01:08 AM


SMUGGLER and CONTRABANDISTA see the words on the fleet of attack it, get most of gunpowder, shipbuilding would use the gun to the rotation of such arms supplies. In the New World, Many settlers are directed at Pirates of the Burning Sea Gold to; you should also rob the fans, like the Nuggets can be there to European businessmen in exchange for the corresponding material.

Posted by: Pirates of the Burning Sea Gold at August 9, 2008 01:07 AM


On the first point, the metallurgical stone! It also belongs to the category of stone, (and stones, to use the same), consumables, can be used only once!More importantly, it is to 30 points (equivalent to 30 yuan RMB) a, you also can be used to purchase Xiah Gold,And the stones were put forward what 1-2 (Anyway, I was raised to 47 pieces by the explosion goods, but fortunately left hand), only two Whitehead!

Posted by: Xiah Gold at August 9, 2008 01:07 AM


rolex replica watches - $98 swiss , we don't sale replica watches.The Art of E-commerce

Posted by: replica watches at August 5, 2008 01:54 AM


I was so poor when I began to the Last Chaos, so I needed the last chaos gold. Someday, one of my friends asked me to go to a new place, we felt very happy when we saw the scene which was very sublime. We think that if we stayed there, we can earn more last chaos gold. And then we can use them to exchange the last chaos money.

Posted by: last chaos gold at August 5, 2008 12:40 AM


But I know it was a good game in people's mind. I could remember the thing which I asked the other role sold the cheap last chaos gold to me to buy last chaos gold. And then I play lots of different role, when I saw the beautiful role, I was very happy. I like the feeling that everybody wear own beautiful cloth. One time I saw a girl, wearing a white skirt.

Posted by: cheap last chaos gold at August 5, 2008 12:38 AM


I could remember the thing which I asked the other role sold the cheap last chaos gold to me to buy last chaos gold. And then I play lots of different role, when I saw the beautiful role, I was very happy. I like the feeling that everybody wear own beautiful cloth.

Posted by: buy last chaos gold at August 5, 2008 12:37 AM


I could remembered that when I first to the commercial city to buy cabal online alz clearly, I was so stupid, I could not entered the commercial city succeed and it always appearance mistake, so I bought the cabal alz instead.

Posted by: cabal online alz at August 5, 2008 12:35 AM


In my opinion it lick into shape the real myself, if you didn't like it, please didn't hurt it, my country people had never felt the other's feeling and used it to earn money, they sold the more cabal gold to change for the more money. I had never buy cabal alz to it I prefer to use a little money to buy the cheaper. I could use the cheaper to change for cabal money. Yes, I was so clever.

Posted by: buy cabal alz at August 5, 2008 12:33 AM


I had never buy cabal alz to it I prefer to use a little money to buy the cheaper. I could use the cheaper to change for cabal money. Yes, I was so clever.

Posted by: cabal money at August 5, 2008 12:32 AM


I had only a little lunia gold and the remedy was not enough, but I still to add the blood to our cavalier which were battling, we saw the enemy became more and more fearfulness, at last my best friend dead. At this time I needed the more lunia war gold to buy blood to save my best friend. I couldn’t go to save my friend, because the enemy was coming and carrying off his lunia online gold.

Posted by: lunia gold at August 5, 2008 12:30 AM


I want to discuss my attainment shallowly about this game. Earned money, exercising rank and doing best quality equipment, these were very important part of this game. Let me say the gaia gold, I used the buy gaia gold usually, of course the cheap gaia gold is the lowest price in this game, because only you have the more money and best quality equipment, you can exercise rank easy.

Posted by: gaia gold at August 5, 2008 12:29 AM


That time I suggest you to buy gaia online gold. Because I think only you have more money, you can use it to buy the better equipments. Because of this better equipment, you can kill more and more golliwogs.

Posted by: gaia online gold at August 5, 2008 12:27 AM


If you carelessness, you will be killed by them perhaps. Expect that you must go to the shop buy the more gaiaonline gold, because you will met you accompanier, if he have difficulty, you should to help him and gave some equipment which he need.

Posted by: gaiaonline gold at August 5, 2008 12:25 AM


No longer, I met a boy, he help me earn goonzu gold and teach me use them to change for goonzu money. We get a good relation each other, we became good friends, at the last days, we build team to kill enemy and buy goonzu gold. I forgot my boy friend. I think he forgot me, too. I hadn’t pull out in it when he came back to find me.

Posted by: goonzu gold at August 5, 2008 12:23 AM


I thought my husband who married in game was very kind, he always sent the goonzu online gold to the new that started to played the game. Perhaps the reason I like him. However our reins last long time, I was so sad at beginning. But the game is only the game, like the cheap goonzu gold. It had no worthiness.

Posted by: cheap goonzu gold at August 5, 2008 12:21 AM


At beginning , you are a poor, but dont worried, the style of game give you a little habbo credits, it is very cheap, you can use them to buy equipment, you can use this equipment to exercise the rank, when you get to a certain rank valid, you dont need the equipment, you should buy the better equipment. This time, you need the habbo gold.

Posted by: habbo credits at August 5, 2008 12:20 AM


nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 16, 2008 04:06 AM


For Lu: Marine One should be a VIP Osprey.
And the a330 is flying corrosion trap junkpile.

Posted by: GM Cassel AMH1(AW) USN RET at March 8, 2008 03:35 PM


It's EADS. -Frank

Posted by: Frank Shuler at February 29, 2008 04:51 PM


> If Boeing wins, I would expect them to
> immediately propose a 777, 787, or even 747-8
> to replace the KC-10's.

There are plans for future follow contracts called KC-Y and KC-Z. The KC-Y will replace the KC-10 and the KC-Z will replace the rest of the 135's.

Posted by: NTV at February 29, 2008 11:28 AM


The problem with using foreign parts for the military is that the first time the Europeans disagree with our military politics try and get support for the aircraft they build!!!

Posted by: Vince at February 29, 2008 08:47 AM


I'm still trying to figure out if you want a few big tankers that can carry a lot of fuel but be in few places, or more smaller tankers that can be in more places. I wonder if its an issue to have more eggs in one basket with each larger aircraft?

If Boeing wins, I would expect them to immediately propose a 777, 787, or even 747-8 to replace the KC-10's.

Posted by: nb at February 28, 2008 08:48 PM


Cargo capacity is fairly important for tankers. The Air Force uses tanker cargo capacity to enable units to self-deploy quickly: load ground equipment, spares, and personnel on board the tanker, and then use the tanker to refuel aircraft en-route. The KC-135 has relatively little cargo capacity, but the KC-10 has proven very useful.

Posted by: George Skinner at February 28, 2008 04:21 PM


While I agree that generally a power like the US should keep things in-house, this is one example of a program that could go either way without any great detriment to US industry. Selecting the EADS product doesn't suddenly mean the US loses it's ability to design airliner-derived tankers. For an f-16 replacement or an M1 follow on etc, keep US design skills for sure.

But with 777s and 787s filling the skies for the next few decades and whoever wins this doing the specialist tanker equipment install in the US anyway, it can be a pragmatic choice.

I do wonder however if general cargo capacity in what AFAIK is a busy tanker fleet is really much of a selling point.

Posted by: ak at February 28, 2008 03:56 PM


"Since most Americans buy foreign built cars, tvs, ipods, ect why can't the Pentagon just do what we do and buy the best product for the best price. I guess that makes too much sense....

Jack"

1) Fundamentally, the ability of the nation to defend itself in time of war is directly related to the strength of the US defense industry.

2) Here's a newsflash: Boeing aircraft, Northrop-Grumman aircraft, and Chevy and Ford trucks ARE the best in the world.

If you disagree on the truck end, go buy a Tundra. I hope your driveshaft doesn't grenade and flail away underneath the truck at 1000 rpm or so, but according to Toyota, there are no guarantees...

We'll just leave the grenading camshafts,

Posted by: PacerX at February 28, 2008 02:58 PM


The ability to lift LESS fuel over a SHORTER range is a WAR LOSING WEAPON that suggests the A330 will win.

The cancelation of the C5 engine upgrade program last week is also a good pointer - A330s carry a lot of freight!

Posted by: Pedro at February 28, 2008 02:26 PM


Despite being partnered with Northrop-Grumman, the KC-30 is still a European product. Toyota and Honda have car assembly plants in North America, but I think most people wouldn't consider them American cars. Same thing with the KC-30 - the real value-added component(design and engineering) is done in Europe. Assembly jobs pay well, but without the design component, they don't provide a long-lived economic benefit. That's why truly domestic manufacturers are usually preferred. This is all irrespective of the quality of the product, of course.

Posted by: George SKinner at February 28, 2008 11:13 AM


Fords and Chevys? I if he walks through the parking lot at work with his eyes shut. (I see plenty of European and Japanese makes in mine.) Not that it really has anything to do with the central point- I expect an Boeing buy as much as anyone else simply on these grounds. T'hell with EADS, anyway.

Posted by: SgtF at February 28, 2008 11:11 AM


Wish Boeing would have put forth the KC-777 instead of the KC-767.

Posted by: Benjamin Fan at February 28, 2008 11:04 AM


I think many are missing the point here. EADS / Airbus are partnered with Northrop Grumman......a US company!

If the consortium wins......and on paper they have the better aircraft.....then the majority of the work will be carried out in the US.

It's time people stopped worrying about where various companies in a partnership originated and start demanding that the equipment purchased is the best bar none.

Posted by: Wren Mandagorn at February 28, 2008 05:03 AM


Kevin, perhaps you should get some of your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

Posted by: pfcem at February 27, 2008 11:32 PM


Boeing has taken the American tax-payer for granted and things have gone way too far with military contractors ripping us off. If Northrop/EADS wins, it will send a message to Boeing that it must compete fairly and effectively, if they want any business.

Posted by: Kevin at February 27, 2008 10:36 PM


We need "life saving" robots for our Fire Fighting Departments.They need to be programed to search for possible survivors in burning buildings,& when they find them,the robots can say to the victims in a thick German accent,"Come with me if you want to LIVE."
For anybody reading this,there are two interesting articles about robots in combat.

"Robot wars 'will be a reality within 10 years'"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/02/27/scirobots127.xml

"Automated killer robots 'threat to humanity': expert"
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080227111811.y9syyq8p&show_article=1

Can the defenders of UAVs,UCAVs(fighters & bombers),UGV(both armed & unarmed),& unmanned surface vessels explain to me why they are creaming in their panties in orgasmic joy over unmanned technology in "war"?

Posted by: Roy Smith at February 27, 2008 08:29 PM


The problem that the air force faces is that it's not as simple as a choice between an ok American plane and a superior european one, it's a choice between a cheaper plane that mostly hauls fuel and a more expensive one that hauls fuel plus some other stuff you can cram into it. Versatility is always a good thing, but it's not as if the air force doesn't have other things to spend money on.

Posted by: Ben at February 27, 2008 07:54 PM


Why in the hell is it that companies can protest contracts. All it does is draw out the time it takes to obtain these aircraft. And with the current state of the Air Forces tanker's, they can't afford any more lag time. Another thing too, these are freakin tankers were talking about.

Here's what the air forces requirements should be for tankers.

1.) They can fly.
2.) Gas can actually be transfered from the tanker to the recieving air craft.

Oh yeah, and another thing, they must be built in
The United States of America.

Posted by: WIGGUM at February 27, 2008 07:21 PM


This contract has a potential value of 100 billion dollars. It is almost certain that the bidder that is not selected when the award is announced will file a protest. It is a shame that this contract bid, which is critical to our national defense, has had the shadow of a scandal hanging over it.

Posted by: Thom Moriarty at February 27, 2008 06:53 PM


Since most Americans buy foreign built cars, tvs, ipods, ect why can't the Pentagon just do what we do and buy the best product for the best price. I guess that makes too much sense....

Jack

Posted by: Jack at February 27, 2008 06:43 PM


If a European helicopter can win the Marine One competition, then nothing is impossible.

Posted by: Lu at February 27, 2008 06:16 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.