Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

First KC-45 in Germany

This article first appeared at Aviation Week.com.

The first Northrop Grumman/EADS North America A330 for the U.S. Air Force has been sent to Germany in preparation for a cargo modification, though work stopped on the project before it got under way.

The first developmental KC-45, called D-1, was sent to Airbus's passenger-to-cargo conversion facility in Dresden March 4. Work on the cargo modification was to begin March 12.

However, Northrop Grumman/EADS's rival, Boeing, protested the $1.5-billion developmental contract award. Per standard procedure, the Air Force issued a stop-work order to Northrop Grumman on March 14, and work on the D-1 conversion came to a halt before it began, according to a company official.

The Government Accountability Office has 100 days to review it and a motion from the Air Force to dismiss some of Boeing's protest claims.

The Air Force obligated $60 million to the winning team prior to the protest.

Northrop Grumman has been coy about what work is under way, largely because of Boeing's protest. The company only acknowledged the transfer of the aircraft late last week.

The cargo conversion is the first in a series of steps to modify the aircraft to fill the Air Force's KC-45 requirements. The aircraft will get its refueling systems at CASA's plant Madrid and later its military specific items, like defensive systems, will be added at Northrop Grumman's Melbourne, Fla., facility.

The first test flight was slated for February 2010 prior to the protest.

More photos of D-1 arriving in Dresden are posted at Aviation Week's Ares defense blog.

Check out more from our Aviation Week friends on ASAT weapons and V-22 money at Military.com.

-- Christian

Comments

Dear Matt,
I knew that the KC-45 is to big for the mission, Boeing's mission but I never get it why that plane is to big for the US Air Force. It's strange that the same company raising doubt about tarmac strength sold the Air Force lately the much heavier C-17.

According to Boeing's add the Airbus is bigger and therefore easier to hit. As I know the counter measure equipment on the proposed KC-767 is from Northrop Grumman.

Posted by: MHalblaub at April 25, 2008 08:38 AM


This aircraft is for the EU and other countries that bought into it - around 1/3 of the world tanker market. It is not the right tanker for the US Air Force however, with 2/3 of the market control.

It is too big for the mission and bases worldwide, does not protect the crew as well as the KC767 would and falls short on far too many criteria compared to the Boeing plane.

To say that the competition for the KC-X was fair is like saying a French company is honest!

Posted by: Matt Eisler at April 25, 2008 12:37 AM


This aircraft is for the EU and other countries that bought into it - around 1/3 of the world tanker market. It is not the right tanker for the US Air Force however, with 2/3 of the market control.

It is too big for the mission and bases worldwide, does not protect the crew as well as the KC767 would and falls short on far too many criteria compared to the Boeing plane.

To say that the competition for the KC-X was fair is like saying a French company is honest!

Posted by: Matt Eisler at April 25, 2008 12:37 AM


You call that a tanker? What a piece of Eurotrash JUNK. How long before this plane falls apart in mid-flight? Not too long I bet. Let's hope the GAO overturns this terrible contract to EADS/Airbus, and gives it to an American company that has real tanker know-how: Boeing.

Posted by: stainlesssteel at April 3, 2008 02:35 PM


Funny how Boeing files a protest for this contract, when they were awarded the CSAR Helo contract under similiar conditions.

Posted by: Christopher at April 1, 2008 12:15 PM


This is very interesting, I will want to wait and see what the plane looks like. ;)

Posted by: Benjamin at April 1, 2008 08:06 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.