Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

US Sells Secret Anti-IED Tech to Iraq

FL_humveearmor_081707.jpg

The U.S. has taken the unprecedented -- and some would say questionable -- step of selling some of its most sophisticated counter-IED technology to the Iraqi government, equipping specialized police, military and interior ministry troops with electronic systems designed to detonate roadside bombs and jam triggering signals.

Officials from Multi-National Security Transition Command-Iraq announced April 20 that its foreign military sales office had sold the Iraqis 411 Lockheed Martin-built "Symphony" counter-IED systems. A few of the Symphony systems are already up and running on Iraqi government vehicles, the command said, with the rest due to be installed by the end of the summer.

"This system will afford the Iraqi security forces long-term, independent counter-IED protection and relieves coalition troops from this responsibility so the latter may perform other tasks," said Army Lt. Col. Will Flucker, the command's Symphony program manager, in an April 20 release. "This system is a critical part of security transition from the coalition forces to the government of Iraq and integral to developing [Iraqi security forces] into a long-term partner in the global war on terror."

But some might see handing over America's most sophisticated and top secret counter-IED technology to Iraqi ministries, whose loyalty to Baghdad is less than certain, as extremely risky. Electronic jammers like the Symphony have saved American lives in a war where the roadside bomb is the number-one killer, and the possibility that an Iraqi official could hand over the technology to an insurgent or unfriendly government is all too real.

"You have to assume that about the third one that we ship over there is going to go straight out the back door," said John Pike, director of the Globalsecurity.org, a Washington-area defense research group. "We have a fundamental dilemma here in trying to indigenize these security forces."

Due to its highly-classified technology, Lockheed Martin spokeswoman Ellen Mitchell refused to discuss Symphony's capabilities or the Iraqi sale. A 2007 Pentagon contract announcement called the Symphony a "programmable, radio-frequency IED defeat system that is vehicle mounted."

The Army's Flucker acknowledged the risk that the technology could wind up in the wrong hands, saying the $51 million deal had been inked only after "numerous technical and administrative delays."

"Most of the administrative hurdles are related to providing effective technology to the partner nation while ensuring such technology is not compromised and does not proliferate beyond Iraq's borders," Flucker wrote Military.com in an email response to questions.

The Iraqi system will incorporate anti-tamper technology along with a fill or operating code that periodically expires and must be renewed in order for the system to operate, and the use of "trusted agents" to handle, control and distribute the operating code, Flucker added.

And that accounts for part of the lengthy "administrative" delays that kept the Symphony -- which costs about $78,000 per system -- out of Iraqi hands for nearly two years.

"This requires a combination of technical and administrative controls that require testing and refinement before they can be implemented with a high degree of confidence," Flucker said.

Pike said that electronic jamming of IEDs is a problem of physics -- there are a limited number of frequencies used to trigger IEDs and the jammers attack all of them. So a Symphony winding up in the hands of the insurgents would have limited utility.

"Whatever waveform it is using to jam ... will by definition be disclosed to the enemy when you turn it on," Pike said, adding that measures to prevent tampering or unauthorized use seem to work.

"I think that they are secure at least to the extent that Iran can't do anything about it," he said.

The Symphony systems will be doled out to Iraqi special forces, ministry of defense officials and interior ministry troops -- including Iraqi army, police, national police and explosive ordnance disposal units. The deal includes a nine-month support contract from Lockheed Martin to "ensure the units function properly and the Iraqis can properly utilize the systems to their full advantage," officials said.

Aside from protecting Iraqi officials, troops and police from roadside bomb ambushes, Flucker hopes the deal will help get more U.S. troops off the road by freeing them up from the dangerous and tedious duties of convoy escort.

"Affording counter-IED protection to the [Iraqi security forces] has been a partnership endeavor from the outset," Flucker added. "Given the theater IED threat, the [government of Iraq] and the coalition have wanted to make this happen for some time now."

-- Christian

Comments

nike shoes,men's nike shoes,women's nike shoes,
nike football shoes,nike shox shoes, men's nike shox, women's nike shox, nike airmax shoes, nike airmax 180, nike airmax 2003, nike airmax 2009, nike airmax 360, nike airmax 87, nike airmax 88, nike airmax 89, nike airmax 90, nike airmax 91, nike airmax 90, nike airmax 95, nike airmax 97, nike airmax tn, nike air stab shoes, nike air yeezy shoes, nike airmax ltd, Air Jordan 1 , Air Jordan 10 , Air Jordan 11 , Air Jordan 11.5, Air Jordan 12 , Air Jordan 13, Air Jordan 14 , Air Jordan 15.5, Air Jordan 16, Air Jordan 17, Air Jordan 18, Air Jordan 19, Air Jordan 2.5, Air Jordan 20+AF1, Air Jordan 23, Air Jordan 24,Air Jordan 25, Air Jordan 3, Air Jordan 4, Air Jordan 4.5+13 Fusion,Air Jordan 5, Air Jordan 6, Air Jordan 6+AF1 Fusion, Air Jordan 7 , Air Jordan 8 , Air Jordan 9, Air Jordan Embroidery 4.5, Air Jordan Fusion 11+23, Air Jordan Fusion 12, Air Jordan Fusion 23, Air Jordan Fusion 5, Air Jordan Gold, Air Jordan Fusion 9, Air Jordan Six Mixed One, Air Jordan Three Mixed One, Air Jordan+Obama 11.5, Jordan Six Rings+Obama, Air Jordan Six Rings 11, Jordan True Flight

Posted by: any at June 16, 2009 09:14 AM


Anyone ever thought about the fact that this might be a tactic to get these as close to the enemy as possible (i.e they buy them from the market) and then they find the frequencies and detonate the IED right there in the factory? I know that sounds far fetched, but what if?

Posted by: Dude at April 15, 2009 10:36 AM


Dear Sir or Madam
Wish you everything goes very well.

I will tell you good new, we manufacture new jammers with lots of function.
It is vehicle mounted bomb jammers for military convoy protection, convoy jamming system counters remote controlled IED attacks by terrorists for convoy security.
Any problem, please communicate me.
Waiting for your reply,
Regards

Sunny Deng
Shenzhen Tangreat Technology Co., Ltd.
Website: www.tangreat.com
E-mail: jammer_blocker05@tangreat.com
MSN: hongsunny2008@hotmail.com
Skype: sunny20081634
Tel: 86-755-33620232
Fax: 86-755-82527821
Mobile: 86-15815576734

Posted by: Sunny Deng at January 7, 2009 05:00 AM


新奇特批发 http://www.jsxqt88.com
新奇特产品 http://www.xqt007.cn
成人玩具 http://www.jsxqt88.com/tupianl.htm
剪板机  http://www.jxwjs.cn
弩 http://www.jsxqt88.com/indexi.htm
乳化机 http://www.ntdyjx.cn
过滤器 http://www.dryent.com
卷板机 http://www.nthljc.cn
弓弩    http://www.gongnuw.cn
弓弩   http://www.gongnuw.com
通风机 http://www.qdwdl.com.cn
剪板机  http://www.ntjixie.com
三面翻  http://www.gr-door.com
混合机 http://www.85399888.cn
搅拌机 http://www.85399888.cn/jiaobanji-01.html
呼吸阀 http://www.ntdyjx.cn/product_29.html
阻火器 http://www.ntdyjx.cn/product_26.html

Posted by: 弓弩 at September 14, 2008 06:53 AM


Gaiacomm International to develop Defeat IED technology


Gaiacomm International will develop Counter (defeat) IED technology for the US Military to be used in Iraq and Afghanistan. This technology is currently classified because of its accurate nature of detection. When deployed it will be able to detect and disable any device in the ground, on person, inside vehicle or building within a determined range, also classified. Soldiers are dying thus, the emphasis on accurate detection. Other technologies currently in the field simply do not operate as planned, thus the need for Gaiacomm's technology.

Posted by: Judah Ben Hur at August 20, 2008 10:52 AM


There IS a way for the IED-s to be defeated, AND, the technology will all but eradicate the senseless detonation of US Soldiers.

The "problem" with rollout of anti-IED technology is that a few major companies all but own the supply of technology to the US Government, ie. Raytheon, General Dynamics, Lockheed, Boeing. UNTIL NOW. Old, antiquated equipment has to be cleared ( "sold" ) to avoid loss to shareholders.

Gaiacomm International Corporation is applying the finishing touches on its technology to be presented to the US Government. If they sell this to IRAQ or any other foreign government that is anti-US, then it very well could be curtains for the US.

We are appalled that dollars & profits come ahead of the lives of our US Soldiers, whether in IRAQ / Afghanistan, or any other place. Worse, you been to any airport lately ? Inched through those "security checkpoint" lines ? Looked around and observed anyone wearing a backpack in the middle of the crowd ? Hey - WHAT IF those backpacks were crammed with high explosives ? Yep - one blast could kill 300+ within seconds - why blow up planes when you can kill 300+ at an airport security point and shut down the whole airport. Think about it. Think hard. KNOW THIS - no IED device is in use at any airport to screen persons walking in. You all better hope Osama bin Laden & his cronies don't pay "US" a visit with a sleeper cell at our neighborhood airport.

IED technology is coming soon to the US Government. If you don't see it within 6 months, and IED-s continue to blow away our soldiers, call your Congressmen and Senators. Don't ask where it is - demand to know why the government has squelched it. How many more US soldiers have to needlessly get killed before we put them ahead of profits to a few large defense contractor firms ?

I welcome your comments and offers to assist us as we confront terrorism. We're open to serious investors who want to be part of the new American Republic. The one that no terrorist dare to walk upon.

Dan Thomas - interim COO & Director - Gaiacomm International Corporation
gaiacomminternational@yahoo.com

Posted by: Dan Thomas at May 4, 2008 02:14 PM


The Isrealis have been pushing this technology for years now, and although it is 'illegal' to own here in the States, I have been in a movie theater where my cell phone had no signal, nor did one ring during an entire movie.

In Mexico, some Priests and Ministers have installed these same device-types in their churches, with nary a service being interrupted by some schmuck who can't stop talking for one hour.

Who knows, 'tamper proof' could mean the same thing it did for the seismic/sound/wiretap relay boxes laid next to the Ho Chi Mihn trail by Road Runner teams. If someone wanted to open it up, it gave them and their friends a Birthday Party.

We aren't going to be giving current-generation (and doubtful last generation either) technology away. As much as CBS and CNN would like to make everyone connected in the Military as a non-thinking knuckle-dragger, you can trip over a few that actually know what they're doing.

Jeez relax already..........

Posted by: P.A. at April 28, 2008 01:27 PM


Being a Vet does not automatically make you informed. Some of you actually know just enough about spectrum dynamics to make yourselves sound credible ....except for the armchair warrior that said there was no way to control the spectrum.

go ahead and next time you go downrange, ask every last operator if they know exactly how the systems work. They dont. Theres a reason for that. Theres also a reason the Lockheed wont discuss this. And to prove that all you blowhards are in left field, you actually believe the Symphony was ever top of the line inventory!

I just have to add that, to the few of you old-skool throwbacks, until you can comprehend how we control the entire non-light data capable spectrum for 200 meters surrounding a moving vehicle and have communications at the same time...well, then do us a favor and shut your non-informed pieholes. You can blame the govts testing and regulation requirements for lack of fielding.

Too worried about politics to read between the blazing huge lines.

Posted by: contractor at April 26, 2008 12:07 PM


I guess it all comes down to how sophisticated the actual hardware is.
If the Software is the amazing part, and it locks up after a time not having the code, it is ok.
If the Hardware is the amazing part and even after the software control is cut off an replaced, well that’s a problem.
Also, even if it shuts down and becomes non-operative after a time, the Chinese and every other A-Hole will be able to see what it is DOING, and then reverse engineer the effect....
I hate to be one of those guys who worries more about the next conflict than the one that we are in, but it just is not such a hot idea to show our hand to people who act just a little too much like Doctor Evil.

Posted by: Dennis at April 25, 2008 05:09 PM


we have allways trained country's that at some point use it against us down the line.Ho
Che Ming Is a good example.And the list keep's going!

Posted by: Robert at April 25, 2008 09:41 AM


We must truly have morons working at the upper levels of the Pentagon who approved this - this gear will be for sale in the Tehran bazaar witbin the week.

Posted by: andrew at April 24, 2008 09:38 PM


Normally, I would read all input before responding. In this case I will do otherwise. ARE WE COMPLETELY NUTS???!!! I am supremely confident that within 12 hours one of those units was in Iran, and 12 hours later it was in Moscow. This is an example of complete lunacy.

Posted by: CTR1(SW) at April 24, 2008 05:08 PM


"Secondly, it is in the interest of the Iraqi's who are using them to keep them secret."

Engr, you'd be amazed how often self preservation DOESN'T make a damn bit of difference to some of those people.

We give them weapons, body armor, and radios that end up at the local market within days of our issuing them out.

Posted by: TB at April 24, 2008 04:40 PM


"The Iraqi system will incorporate anti-tamper technology along with a fill or operating code that periodically expires and must be renewed in order for the system to operate, and the use of "trusted agents" to handle, control and distribute the operating code,"

Bwhah hahahah! I can just see Ahmed Chalabi being shuffled around Iraq by Blackwatercopters with the code of the week (day? hour?).

As John Pike said: ""We have a fundamental dilemma here..."

The problem is we aren't welcomed or wanted there... Except by Ahmed and co.

Oh, and: "...there are a limited number of frequencies used to trigger IEDs..." is absolutely false.

I can trigger something with a battery, some wire, and a file to arc the wires against, an old cb walkie talkie, a car alarm keychain dongle (probably on the list of blocked frequencies), or just about anything that exhibits EMF in use... Admittedly, more hazardous than dedicated explosives detonators, but do-able.

Want safe? The 80 meter ham band with superimposed tone encode. You could trigger a device on the other side of the planet.

There are more ways to make and detonate explosive devices of ANY type, than you will EVER be able to develop counter-measures for.

It's time to leave Iraq, before more US soldiers die for no good reason.

Posted by: Da' Buffalo Amongst Wolves at April 24, 2008 04:34 PM


What's with the doom and gloom? This is hardly high tech stuff, as pointed out before. It's just a very broad spectrum jammer that feebly attempts to stop IEDs from going off. For the record, I haven't seen anywhere noted where it has conclusively made a difference. As if Iran doesn't already know how to get around it. They can also just turn to manual detonation. We're talking about groups that already uses suicide bombers, so it's not exactly a giant leap.

The MNF should consider themselves so lucky that their problem is with half-assed homemade bombs buried in the street versus shoulder fired sophisticated anti tank and anti aircraft missiles. Wouldn't that be a joy?

Posted by: SW1911 at April 24, 2008 01:49 PM


Odds are the only thing secret about this system is how much it costs the US Taxpayers to buy one vs. the Iraqis. Honestly it can't be all that sensitive, we're talking about something that busts IEDs not an F-22 or F-35, the latter of which we are going to sell to the Saudis. This "Symphony" system is probably just a wide spectrum low powered transmitter that triggers any IED controlled by radio or cellphone. You know, the kind of things wise asses like me used to build out piles of junk bought out of Radioshack, Sears, and the local electronics supply wholesaler. Except I did it to annoy people and amuse myself, and probably for a hell of a lot less.

Posted by: Bob at April 24, 2008 01:27 PM


I dont see the risk. As they say, you can passively determine the functioning of the jammers already (with an antenna and O-scope). There is not much they could learn with possession of the actual device.

Secondly, it is in the interest of the Iraqi's who are using them to keep them secret.

Posted by: Engr at April 24, 2008 11:20 AM


The US is cutting off its nose to spite the face in the stupid decision to sell counter-IED tech.

Posted by: WR at April 24, 2008 08:54 AM


this is unbelievably naive...

if true, it's just another sign of the USA's nosedive into the dustbin of history.

Posted by: llflllfl at April 24, 2008 08:40 AM


Yeah, probably.

Posted by: Penta at April 24, 2008 08:06 AM


By the next time I go downrange either:

A) the ins and outs of this system will be on an islamic website or

B) I'll find pieces of this system at an Iraqi market or weapons cache.

Posted by: TB at April 24, 2008 07:59 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.