Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Armored Chaps, Hearing Pro and Slimmer Vests

armor-suit.jpg

Greetings folks. Just an FYI -- I've been at a military armor protection conference today getting the latest insight on body and vehicle armor, active protection systems, advanced materials and other protective equipment.

First bit of news comes from an official with the Army's combat developments directorate at Fort Benning who described some upcoming "soldier protection demonstrations" that will take a look at various new technology solutions to common problems on the battlefield. This is the same way the Army came up with its vastly-improved body armor, or IOTV.

The first initiative is a combat vehicle crewman armor suite that recognizes the tight confines of a vehicle and its various entry ports and takes advantage of the vehicles inherent armor protection. But the official, John Yancey, recognized that Humvee gunners and other vehicle gunners might need more armor for blast mitigation in an IED scenario.

It all needs to fit into a new philosophy the Army wants vendors to adhere to in armor design that calls for modularization in armor components. In other words, Yancey wants to give commanders the leeway to add or subtract armor components based on mission and threat. A door kicker only needs a plate carrier, a vehicle gunner needs arm, shoulder, face and neck protection, he said.

Another SPD going on right now at Benning is looking into hearing protection and enhancement. Kinda like "hunters ear" already on the market.

Yancey also talked about an upcoming SPD on lower extremity protection, including six vendors who've submitted products such as ballistic shorts, pants and chaps. Yancey admitted no Soldier was going to have to wear Kevlar pants on patrol, but a vehicle gunner might really appreciate them. He also mentioned that the Army was taking another look at whether the current padding system in the advanced combat helmet is making the grade.

Stay tuned for more from the Military Armor Protection conference taking place in Alexandria, Va., today and tomorrow.

-- Christian

Comments

nike shoes,men's nike shoes,women's nike shoes,
nike football shoes,nike shox shoes, men's nike shox, women's nike shox, nike airmax shoes, nike airmax 180, nike airmax 2003, nike airmax 2009, nike airmax 360, nike airmax 87, nike airmax 88, nike airmax 89, nike airmax 90, nike airmax 91, nike airmax 90, nike airmax 95, nike airmax 97, nike airmax tn, nike air stab shoes, nike air yeezy shoes, nike airmax ltd, Air Jordan 1 , Air Jordan 10 , Air Jordan 11 , Air Jordan 11.5, Air Jordan 12 , Air Jordan 13, Air Jordan 14 , Air Jordan 15.5, Air Jordan 16, Air Jordan 17, Air Jordan 18, Air Jordan 19, Air Jordan 2.5, Air Jordan 20+AF1, Air Jordan 23, Air Jordan 24,Air Jordan 25, Air Jordan 3, Air Jordan 4, Air Jordan 4.5+13 Fusion,Air Jordan 5, Air Jordan 6, Air Jordan 6+AF1 Fusion, Air Jordan 7 , Air Jordan 8 , Air Jordan 9, Air Jordan Embroidery 4.5, Air Jordan Fusion 11+23, Air Jordan Fusion 12, Air Jordan Fusion 23, Air Jordan Fusion 5, Air Jordan Gold, Air Jordan Fusion 9, Air Jordan Six Mixed One, Air Jordan Three Mixed One, Air Jordan+Obama 11.5, Jordan Six Rings+Obama, Air Jordan Six Rings 11, Jordan True Flight

Posted by: any at June 16, 2009 11:10 AM


[url=http://buy-aoc-gold.rgtrcredit.com/][color=#800080][b]Age Of Conan Gold [/b][/color][/url][url=http://www.aocsale.com/][color=#800080][b]Age Of Conan Gold [/b][/color][/url][url=http://www.buy-cheap-aoc-gold.com/][color=#800080][b]Age Of Conan Gold[/b][/color][/url][url=http://www.buy-cheap-aoc-gold.com/][color=#800080][b]buy age of conan gold [/b][/color][/url]
[url=http://www.aocsale.com/][color=#800080][b]buy age of conan gold[/b][/color][/url][url=http://buy-aoc-gold.rgtrcredit.com/][color=#800080][b]buy age of conan gold [/b][/color][/url][url=http://www.buyfastgold.com/][color=#800080][b]aoc gold [/b][/color][/url][url=http://buy-aoc-gold.hellgate-pd.com/][color=#800080][b]aoc gold [/b][/color][/url][url=http://www.buyfastgold.com/][color=#800080][b]aoc gold[/b][/color][/url]
[url=http://buy-aoc-gold.hellgate-pd.com/][color=#800080][b] buy aoc gold [/b][/color][/url][url=http://www.buyfastgold.com/][color=#800080][b] buy aoc gold[/b][/color][/url]

your site is good ,welcome to our sites
http://www.buyfastgold.com

http://www.buy-cheap-aoc-gold.com

http://www.aocsale.com

http://buy-aoc-gold.hellgate-pd.com

http://buy-aoc-gold.rgtrcredit.com

Posted by: aoc gold at May 27, 2008 05:38 AM


Has anything been done in relation to face protective masks? Running in an open battle field makes these full armor suits totally impractical,but would the suits work in,say,a SWAT type situation of entering houses & clearing rooms? That seems the only real practical use for them.

Posted by: Roy Smith at May 22, 2008 10:19 AM


Of course, it's obvius to us bloggers that you should only make a man wear part of the suit. That's the point of the suit.

But war isn't always so cut-and-dry. I'm reminded of how in "Black Hawk Down", the men didn't bring night vision because they were sure the mission would be done before dark.

NCO's want to make sure every man gets home safe as opposed to whether every man is comfortable. And yes, I do realize its easy to defend NCO's when I'm not around them

Posted by: Pantera at May 21, 2008 12:19 PM


atacms,

First, the exoskeleton was not discussed at the conference. I think that's too far off in the future to be practical and may be overcome by events such as carbon nano-tube empregnated polymer fiber armors and other innovations. Also, not much to take pictures of unfortunately. There weren't many vendors at all.

Posted by: Christian at May 21, 2008 07:31 AM


Any idea who produces this suit, how much is full weight and how much for one suit? Or any information sources?

Posted by: Suncec at May 21, 2008 04:13 AM


I'm worried about mobility. I bet those arms and legs don't bend as easily.

Posted by: G at May 20, 2008 11:36 PM


slntax,
It's nice to know that there are still dumb ass senior NCOs who only seem to care more about how your sleeping bag is "canoe rolled" than common sense protection of the troops.Unless the "senior NCO" felt that the "flame retardant" capabilities of the ACU top(they are flame retardant,aren't they?) would protect the soldier in case a fire broke out in the tank(versus,if the T-Shirt is made of polyester,the T-Shirt melting into his skin & making any burn worse),then it does seem damn stupid to worry about "military appearance" in a war zone.
I still say though that that full body armor suit should only be worn in a urban situation of clearing rooms or poking into tunnels to find the enemy.THAT'S common sense.

Posted by: Roy Smith at May 20, 2008 10:29 PM


That full suit should ONLY be worn for MOUT operations in urban environments.After all,you can only move from room to room as fast as a closed & locked door will let you.Hell yes,this is impractical for wide open areas like the Afghanistan mountainsides,but it would have been nice for clearing buildings(& mosques) in Fallujah.I'm sure,with an appropriate close quarter weapon,nobody would mind the extra weight,in closed quarters(like maybe "tunnel rats"),if it was the only thing protecting them.

Posted by: Roy Smith at May 20, 2008 10:19 PM


GREAT i cant wait to wear this in the 120 degree of iraq and then fallout from a heat injury. if you think commanders will use good judgment and make mission specific choices. you are dead wrong. most will say "just put it all on" everytime from the fear of someone getting hurt by making of choice of not putting on all the armor. and then getting pounded on by the chain of command for not wearing full battle rattle that could have avoided the injury in the first place. a friend of mine got yelled at by a sargent major for wearing his tee shirt and his body armor over it in a tank. in iraq sitting inside the drivers hole in a tank for 9 plus hours it gets plenty hot. why did he get a article 15? he was out of uniform by not wearing his acu top. common sense not something found in the army.

Posted by: slntax at May 20, 2008 09:04 PM


could you post some pics of some things you saw at the conference? PLEASE??

I'd have loved to have gone, but those conferences are WAY too pricey?!!

Posted by: atacms at May 20, 2008 08:55 PM


Christian,

At the conference, could you let us know or make some comments/inquiries on how the Army sees the exoskeleton (that Sarcos/Raytheon is working on) fitting into this new need for protection of more body area coverage?

If you don't know what I'm referring to, pls see this: http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2008-04/building-real-iron-man

Posted by: atacms at May 20, 2008 08:53 PM


Yes, it looks heavy. But this guy is wearing the full suit. I think the point of the new suit is that you only have to wear parts of it. Which is pretty cool.

Posted by: Pantera at May 20, 2008 08:03 PM


BTW what kind of protection all those parts offer? NIJ III?

Posted by: Suncec at May 20, 2008 03:49 PM


Damn, that guy on the pic is armored like hell. Any idea bout weight of all that stuff?

Posted by: Suncec at May 20, 2008 03:40 PM


Time for a HALO suit, nothing like a punch of Master Chiefs kicking butt and taking names.

Posted by: willie at May 20, 2008 03:36 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.