Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

India's Navy Expanding Rapidly

indian-navy.jpg

While Chinese naval modernization efforts are capturing the attention of Western naval officials and analysts as well as journalists and even bloggers, little attention is being given to the Indian Navy's massive expansion effort. Mohammed Ahmedullah, a leading defense writer, wrote in Military Technology (2/2008):

"With the second biggest Army in the world and a rapidly expanding Navy, India knows that it needs to modernize fast, leapfrog in technology and accumulate military assets rapidly over the next decade if it has to safeguard it growing economic might with military teeth. . . ."

Within a decade the naval forces of India will include two large aircraft carriers, a large force of missile-armed surface warships, and a significant submarine flotilla, probably including three nuclear-propelled attack submarines. The rationale for the expansion of the Indian fleet is to protect the flow of oil to India's rapidly growing economy.

However, the Indian subcontinent sits astride the tanker sailing routes from the Middle East to Chin and Japan. And, Indian naval forces could come into play with respect to the continuing turmoil and quest for resources in Africa.

The current Indian Navy expansion program provides for the rehabilitation of the Soviet-built, 44,570-ton carrier Admiral Gorshkov in a Russian shipyard. That project is far behind schedule and over cost; the ship should be fully operational about 2015. India has also begun construction of an "air defense ship" -- a 40,000-ton carrier to be completed about 2018. (India now operates the 28,700-ton, ex-British VSTOL carrier Hermes; she was originally launched in 1953 and completed in 1969, and has been extensively rebuilt.)

Now being procured are advanced missile-armed destroyers and frigates. Some are being fitted with the highly-touted Israel Barak-8 air-defense system.

With respect to submarines, the Navy currently operates 14 relatively modern submarines: four German Type 209/1500 (built in Germany and India) and ten Russian-built Kilo/Project 877EM. Some of the latter are being fitted to fire the Russian-developed Klub-S submerged-launch, anti-ship missile. However, there have been some problems encountered with that modification to the submarines.

Six French-built Scorpene torpedo-attack submarines are under construction in at the Mazagon Dockyard in Mumbai. These will replace the last of the Foxtrot/Project 641 submarines operated by India.

Most significant, India will again operate nuclear-propelled submarines in the near future. Three Akula/Project 971 torpedo-attack submarines are on order, being constructed in Russia. These are 33-knot, relatively quiet submarines, capable of operating to 1,970 feet feet, armed with four 21-inch and four 25.5-inch torpedo tubes and carrying 40 tube-launched missiles and torpedoes. (India previously operated a nuclear submarine from 1988 to 1991, when a Soviet Charlie I/Project 670 cruise missile submarine was leased to India. Soviet personnel operated the submarine's reactor-propulsion plant.)

For the past two decades India has also been working on the development of an indigenous nuclear-propelled submarine, officially labeled the Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV). The project has encountered numerous difficulties, but there are reports that the first ATV submarine is now under construction at the Mazagon Dock Yard. The first of several such craft may be completed as early as 2010. She will have a submerged displacement of some 7,000 tons and will carry cruise missiles as well as torpedoes.

The Indian Navy is also procuring advanced aircraft to support fleet operations: These include MiG-29K multi-role aircraft and Ka-31 airborne early warning helicopters for the carriers, and land-based Il-38D maritime patrol aircraft.

Whereas in the past few decades the Indian Navy has relied upon Soviet and -- to a lesser degree -- British naval technology, Indian leaders are shopping world-wide. Israeli, French, and South African as well as Russian weapons are being sought. And, the former U.S. amphibious ship Trenton (LPD 14) was transferred to India in 2007 and it is likely that six Lockheed Martin C-130J Hercules aircraft will be acquired. Obviously, there are other U.S. naval platforms and systems of interest to India.

Thus, the Indian Navy is undergoing a massive expansion. By some criteria the naval expansion is greater than that of the other services. And, unlike the Chinese naval modernization, India's efforts are taking advantage of essentially all of the world's naval technologies and are being undertaken with relatively little publicity.

-- Norman Polmar

Comments

i think the two three major things IN needs to do in next ten years is induct three carriers,six akula class nuc subs and air reconnaissance aircratfs

Posted by: kotla at July 26, 2008 04:40 PM


hey man

BHARAT MATA KI JAI.....THATS IT GUYS...

INDIAN ARMED FORCES R TERE 4 PROTECTING MORE THAN 1BILLION PPL IN THIS WORLD GUYS FRM SILLY PAKIS ND CHINIS SO NEED TO EXPAND...


NO WORRIES ON WAR

FOR PAKIS ITS INDIA
4 INDIA IT S CHINIS
4 CHINIS TERE IS AMERICA
ND FOR AMERICA ....HELL ITS AMERICS ITSELF WHICH WILL END ITSELF

Posted by: xxx at June 26, 2008 12:15 PM


Its the oldest rule in statecraft 'enemy of my enemy is my friend'.

India's biggest threats for the forseeable future are:

1.A powerful china out to grab its territoy across its vast border.

2.Terrorism

3.High oil prices

I believe you guys can feel our pain.


Posted by: Shantanu Chatterjee at June 16, 2008 02:44 AM


India is constrained within its boarders. It don't want to peek into others. So why creat suspecion in India, Create rupture with india? Let us ignore the thousands of remote area lying with in boarders of India. And get a good friendship with india.

Posted by: soma at June 13, 2008 06:09 AM


Indias caste system can effect naval manpower & it could effect Hormuz Straits.
Otherwise Navy is begnign?
NOT Blue water Navy?
But then India can change.
Love their curry & rice & that Indian actress with an A for first name, wow.
Yes to India for Cuisine & culture, NOT for its "many gods".
That 2 can play role for Indian Navy defense roles.

Posted by: stephen russell at June 11, 2008 09:50 PM


This ought to give Beijing something to think about. Even better if we sell India some sensors...

Posted by: Rix at June 10, 2008 02:46 PM


OMFG! spell check

Posted by: James at June 10, 2008 01:51 PM


howly crap ohwilleke!!!!

I agree dant see why we are even trying to be buddy buddy with pakistan, india hates pakistan pakistan hates us evil americans and india loves america. Hell sell them everything but the iowa class BB.

my big problem with india is theres still that damn class system.

Posted by: James at June 10, 2008 01:50 PM


Excellent. Our bulwark against the Chinese and Russians is getting stronger. India is as desperate for oil as we are, probably more, and that works beautifully to our advantage. Not to mention they could help us crush the Iranians (who I don't consider a threat)to try out their new toys.

Posted by: Marine1 at June 10, 2008 12:38 PM


Indian naval expansion has received less attention because India is not in an expansionist political posture. It doesn't lay claim to Sri Lanka or the Maldives, for example.

Its boundary disputes with China and the conflict in Kashmir are in places where naval power is irrelevant.

China, in contrast, lays claim to Taiwan and is perceived as a threat by our allies Japan and South Korea.

India is also one of the most democratic of the post-Colonial nations in the world, for all the warts that come with a democractic form of government.

Far more troubling than Indian military expansion, is the fact that we are helping making the Pakistani military more capable. Pakistan is a far less reliable ally than India, is sheltering Osama bin Laden, has nuclear weapons, still has a pervasively militarily influenced government, and is just transitioning out of an outright military dictatorship.

Pakistan also has little case for a strong military. India has no designs on it. China's territorial disputes with Pakistan (if any) are far less serious than those between India and China. And, Afghanistan is in no position to threaten Pakistan. Iran could be a threat to Pakistan but has no recent history of hostilities with it.

Posted by: ohwilleke at June 10, 2008 11:38 AM


I would be very interested in some credible sources concerning the alleged three Akulas for India. This is a rumour thats going on for more than ten years now and it never went beyond anything more than hearsay. The author can even take credit for increasing the number of phantom boats to three where before this number was supposed to be one or two units. I fail to see any current or foreseeable significance in this issue.

Posted by: turin at June 10, 2008 11:32 AM


i think india will start to flex more and more its navel muscles. esp with the news of the not so secret chinese sub base on Hainan Island in the south china sea. india is dependent on oil from the mideast to keep its economy going. the last thing they need is the chinese to dominate the indian ocean. i think it would be smart for us, japan, korea and australia to get together and ensure indian and pacific trade routes.

Posted by: slntax at June 10, 2008 11:06 AM


I still wish we could be closer allies with India. They seem to do a good job of keeping muliple ethic groups decent towards each other.

Posted by: Jeff at June 10, 2008 10:21 AM


I find it interesting that India could have a better Soviet Navy than the Russians do.

Posted by: Lefty at June 10, 2008 09:52 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.