Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Bell Bearish on 609

bell609.jpg

Defense Tech friend and contributor Bob Cox of the Fort Worth Star Telegram has been a Bell-Boeing/Osprey/tiltrotor watchdog for years. His latest story is quite a scoop and looks like a crushing blow to the civilian tiltrotor industry in which Bell had invested a lot of effort and hope.

Bell Helicopter spent a half-century developing tilt-rotor technology and the V-22 Osprey, but the company’s once-enthusiastic commitment to build a similar aircraft for the civilian market seems to have diminished considerably.

The company doesn’t see a promising market in the U.S. for the BA609 tilt-rotor aircraft and has shifted a larger share of the continuing development work to its Italian joint-venture partner, AgustaWestland.

Bell will continue to provide personnel and some funding for continued development and testing of the BA609, but Mike Blake, executive vice president of programs for the company, said AgustaWestland will provide more capital and take the lead in completing flight testing and production of the aircraft.

"I think Bell will always be involved in the 609 program in some way," he said in an interview with the Star-Telegram. "How is to be determined."

Officials of the two companies met recently and agreed on the latest revision to the development plan and timetable, Blake said. Test aircraft three and four have been delivered to AgustaWestland, which will now operate three of the four test planes. Bell will continue test flights of the first aircraft from its Xworkx facility in Arlington.

A six- to nine-passenger aircraft, the BA609 was designed to take advantage of tilt-rotor technology to provide an aircraft for government and private-sector users that combines airplane speed with the vertical takeoff and landing capability of a helicopter.

When the Bell-Agusta alliance was formed in 1998, company officials advertised the BA609 as a $10 million aircraft and said they had 68 orders. Now they have about 80 orders, many of them on the books for a decade. No firm price is quoted publicly, but numbers in the range of $15 million to $20 million each are tossed about within the industry.

Publicly, Bell officials continued to voice support for the program. But privately it’s another matter.

Again, as you all know I'm a proponent of tiltrotor technology and think that opposition to it has become almost like a religion. And with the bleak history of the V-22, who can blame them.

But to me if the civilian version of the V-22 can't get any traction then it seems that tiltrotors still have a long way to go before they can be considered viable alternatives to rotorcraft. And I guess cost and convenience would have to play a large role as well.

Good on Bob for keeping Bell honest.

-- Christian

Comments

In my opinion, Knight Online Gold is a fun game that mighthave been worth playing a few years ago despite the slowness.

Posted by: Knight Online Gold at August 26, 2008 11:32 PM


At last, The Second Life linden world is a place dedicated to your creativity. After all, an avatar is your persona in the virtual world.

Posted by: Second Life linden at August 26, 2008 11:18 PM


Many people think that Meisha good kill. The sense of aversion to the, No friends (pegged out) and of course there will be no joy. No maple story mesos, you will not feel happy! I just like playing a few career, spent a total of 100 to block it.

Posted by: maple story mesos at August 8, 2008 07:49 PM


I have been of great success at finally, my rank already practiced 43 levels and we have own a large of fiesta Gold.

Posted by: fiesta Gold at August 6, 2008 04:01 AM


Therefore, when I practiced this role, I have also spent much energy and the 2moons gold.

Posted by: 2moons gold at August 6, 2008 04:00 AM


Ability to control the situation on whether the initiative has become a yardstick by. You can also buy potbs gold prove it. The game itself and its audience is not a direct rival between the tug-of-war contests, game aims to want to show the classic fencing in the occupied upper hand skills.

Posted by: potbs gold at August 5, 2008 09:23 PM


When their Daguai no ability to make money when you can buy Maple mesos. Later games to a new BOSS, Puchu a lot of things, because why did not go to school, the students later I have been playing this game until the most senior.

Posted by: Maple mesos at August 5, 2008 09:22 PM


rolex replica watches - $98 swiss , we don't sale replica watches.The Art of E-commerce

Posted by: replica watches at August 3, 2008 09:21 PM


The game world, Red dust roll, the vast human sea, a friend to encounter each other, can come together and mutual understanding, mutual understanding and closer, it is fate. In life journey, in their different life trajectory, the different experiences in the heart of the sea, to meet each other, it can be said is a lucky, fate is not at all times, should treasure the hard earned edge.
Game days, he pursued JP, clothes completely F10, fire 8. Hands and feet are completely F10. Knife is the Z10. WGF complete sets of 80. Certainly, he spent a lot of SOF gold. He is also very good friends. They play with friends are also now 10 knives. But one day, the things of him was lost, we are very sad.

Posted by: SOF gold at August 2, 2008 02:56 AM


"Next up: What is the Pope's religion?"

The Pope's religion is obviously Catholic. However, in our denomination, our Confession (in addition to the Lutheran and other Reformed Confessions) states that the Pope is Anti-Christ and "Son of Perdition" in the New Testament (i.e, Thessalonians).

Posted by: coviepresb1647 at July 10, 2008 10:45 AM



Breaking news: Tilt-rotors are not economical!

Next up: What is the Pope's religion?

Not too surprising, but it'll be very impressive if they really can deliver a 609 at less than $25m at that volume. Meanwhile, other technology like the fast rotorcraft covered recently is going to start eating away at the potenetial market at much lower cost.

Posted by: David Hambling at July 8, 2008 07:40 AM


Why couldn't VIP air squadrons like the Army's 12th Aviation Battalion or the Marine's Marine One Squadron use them? I also thought that the Coast guard were considering using these? I don't think that the problem here is no mission for them,but it is rather no imagination for what they could do.Also,if it's a matter of cost,congress doesn't seem to have a problem with finding money for bridges to nowhere in Alaska,I'm very sure they could find money for this.

Posted by: Roy Smith at July 8, 2008 06:16 AM


Except perhaps for medevac use, where speed often means life, I don't see many civilian customers legitimizing the increased cost of a tilt rotor vs. what's already on the market at a lower price. Bell is probably doing the smart thing.

Posted by: justbill at July 8, 2008 05:18 AM


Watch some foreign Co. develop the 609 & Bell eats crow, good fwd thinking Mgmt.
The civil marketplace is Huge:
Air Cargo.
Tourisim: over HI, Grand Canyon areas alone.
MedEvac
Commutter airline.
shuttle to offshore oil fields
replace jetcopters for execs.
Wow.
Dumb move Bell.
Really lame move.

Posted by: stephen russell at July 7, 2008 09:46 PM


A cursory search found a British Company (FALX Air Vehicles) with a preliminary draft for a design for a electric hybrid tilt rotor design for a one or two seat aircraft. More of a Homebuilt/Sportplane than anything else. They are looking for money (!!!) for development.

The idea would require a sound engineering analysis before I would get too excited about it. Note: Even the newer electric motors are not light.

Posted by: tipover at July 7, 2008 01:19 PM


One other significant market segment for civilian rotorcraft is the offshore oil rig transport. A tiltrotor would seem to be ideal for this market segment as well.

Posted by: Formerly known as Skeptic at July 7, 2008 01:12 PM


ohwilleke; good analysis that summarizes the considerations neatly.

Posted by: tipover at July 7, 2008 12:59 PM


Another reason they may be backing away is a British Company just came out and said they are developing a Hybrid tilt rotor design.
A turbine makes electricity in the body and sends it to electric motors to turn the props.
No fuel lines thorough the tilt part. No multiple hydraulics systems through the tilt part.
This design is about a hundred times simpler. And a lot more heavy duty.

Posted by: Dennis at July 7, 2008 12:58 PM


Military capability and requirements don't always cross over to civilian needs. Someday someone may come up with a need for VTOL, long range, high speed that justifies the price. Example: The Hummer is a great military vehicle but most civilians don't have the real need for the vehicles capability's at the cost involved. Something cheaper will do the job (H2 and H3 work as well in most cases, are cheaper and still provide some ego boost for wannabe's).

So far the market for the product has not been developed or is there. It sounds like the manufacturers need to develop and SELL their product; the customers are not running to them with money in hand.

Could it be that military contractors are used to the customer coming to them with a request for a product, paying for development and obligating themselves to a minimum purchase?

Posted by: tipover at July 7, 2008 12:48 PM


The currently economically viable uses are light civilian passenger rotorcraft are basically, in approximately this order of market size:

1. TV News
2. Medevac
3. Law enforcement
4. VIP transportation
5. Military/coast guard/national guard duty

A tilt rotor doesn't seem to add much to TV News or Law Enforcement use, where the focus is on hovering while in the air at short range, not medium distance transport with verticle landing.

The military/coast guard/national guard function seems more likely to be filled by the Osprey than the 609. SAR duty and security team transport both favor large passenger numbers and payloads.

This leaves Medevac and VIP transport. Both are thin markets. But VIP transport is thinner and more price conscious -- taking a helicopter from a downtown helipad to private jet isn't that much more burdensome than going direct from helipad to destination, but is much cheaper, although someone might want one for the attention it attracts. The VIP market is also limited by the tortured testing history of the Osprey which might inspire fear when your billion dollar CEO is in one.

Medevac seems a perfect role for the 609. Time is truly of the essence for medevac. The need for rotorcraft is to takeoff and land, rather than to hover during flight. The greater range and speed than a traditional rotorcraft would be a significant benefit. And, the ability to have a larger payload would be nice; most have room for one or two patients and two crew, at best.

The best business strategy for selling the 609, it would seem to me, is to get the planes out there being used so that they can demonstrate their value. Individual lives saved in remote areas make a better sales pitch than specifications on paper.

Perhaps Bell should try to get a rural health grant to put some in the hands of communities that need long range, difficult terrain medevac and can't afford it. Alaska's earmark kings and queens would have an easier time selling 609s for remote medevac than they would roads to nowhere.

Posted by: ohwilleke at July 7, 2008 12:41 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.