Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

The Ultimate M16/M4 Mag

tango-down-mags.jpg

Under development for three years, the ARC Magazine was designed specifically for USSOCOM’s SCAR program. However, it will also fit M16-style weapons including receivers with out of spec magwells. Unfortunately, magwell tolerances has been an issue for many magazines for years going back to the Israeli Orlite mags that hit the US market over 20 years ago and an ongoing problem ever since. Manufactured from a high strength polymer, the ARC magazine will be available initially in 5.56×45mm and 7.62×51mm for both FN SCAR light and heavy weapons.

Notice how the lower half of the magazine has a somewhat more pronounced curve than a standard 30 round M16 magazine. The allows the magazine to have the optimal ammunition stack. Additionally, the joint is secured with an adhesive with a higher strength than the actual magazine body.

This is a no maintenance magazine other than to brush it down and spray it out with compressed air or water. Also, note that there is no floor plate. This means that it is a five sided box construction and extremely strong. Additionally, the chromium spring resists corrosion. Tangodown has also developed a maritime version with a one way drain valve for OTB operations.

The 'gasket' between magwell and magazine is actually a soft durometer silicone seal that is bonded to the magazine and will only be found on the government issue variants and serves as a sand or dust seal.

The ARC Magazine will be available in Black, Flat Dark Earth, and Foliage Green. Due to the different geometry of the ARC magazine new pouches are under development for the GI model but the commercial variant will fit most standard ammo pouches.

-- Soldier Systems

Comments

Plastic magazines are a joke. They cannot take the cold. I see people drive over the magazine and act like that's a test. Plastic magazines split at the back and the front gets chewed up. It's the pressures from within and not without that cracks the backs. I haven't see any of them go past 5,000 rounds.

Stick with steel M-16 magazines and quit the buying the fashion designer crap.

Posted by: Eric Von Teufel at December 21, 2008 12:01 AM


I believe that we should purchase what is all around more practical for our military, I see we are heading for a time where spending will be cut and budgets will be closely scrutinized. Not fully being able to evaluate this magazine myself leaves me at a disadvantage to fairly comment. Practical experience in the field is where it counts and testing in the field is difficult. Although I do enjoy a good day at the range, nothing can beat how something will perform like having real live situations.
Also I see the lower part of the body of this mag appears plastic or maybe some sort of polymer. I am sure they have looked at cold weather performance and durability as well.

Posted by: Gary at December 12, 2008 07:55 AM


Soldier Systems,

You're correct in that we may not be fair in assuming that the ARC magazine is not as good as the Pmag. Truthfully, none of us have used the magazine on the range and it could turn out that the magazine is every bit as reliable as a Pmag.

What we ARE criticizing, is the fact that the magazine, has the capabilities of a Pmag (save that gasket) at nearly TWICE the price AND requires new magazine pouches.

It just seems to boggle the mind, that anyone would pay for an ARC mag which require a new carrying system, when a cheaper design is readily available which require no changes, save the magazine itself.

Posted by: JRS at December 8, 2008 05:30 PM


I still say the Magpul P-mag is better

Posted by: Drift Monster at December 8, 2008 05:08 PM


I have a couple of these on the shelf at my shop. I'll give them a try during my next tactical rifle class and let you know.

Posted by: flash at December 8, 2008 01:35 PM


The site is selling cheap world of World gold and wow power leveling.we also sell maple story money and maple story item in maple story and other MMO game.Look here to Buy Cheap WoW Gold with Fast Instant Delivery!

http://www.vcsale.com/ buy wow gold
http://www.vcsale.com/ cheap wow gold
http://www.vcsale.com/ wow gold
http://www.vcsale.com/cheappest wow gold
http://www.vcsale.com/service.Warhammer_Online_US.31.aspx warhammer gold
http://www.vcsale.com/service.Warhammer_Online_US.31.aspx warhammer powerleveling
http://www.vcsale.com/service.Warhammer_Online_US.31.aspx war gold
http://www.vcsale.com/service.Warhammer_Online_US.31.aspx war powerleveling
http://www.vcsale.com/service.Warhammer_Online_US.31.aspx war power leveling
http://www.vcsale.com/service.EverQuest.15.aspx cheap everquest platinum

Posted by: wow gold at December 7, 2008 10:31 PM


Amazing how quickly folks are throwing this magazine under the bus without ever having even seen one in person yet let alone used one.

The deal with the different versions (GI and commercial) has to do with out of spec mag wells. Even Pmags are having problems with this issue.

Posted by: Soldier Systems at December 7, 2008 09:42 PM


Yah, the non window version was running around 15.95 and the windowed version 17 or 18.95 pre election
Since Obama got elected the prices have gone up at the dealers due to increased demand for full capacity magazines and lack of magazines in stock.
28? Yah, not worth it. I'll stick with P-mags, thanks

Posted by: coolhand77 at December 6, 2008 04:49 PM


Coolhand,

The pre-order prices I saw for the mag were in the $28 dollar range. If I'm not mistaken, Pmags are about half that.

Posted by: JRS at December 5, 2008 03:39 PM


The ARC Magazine is irrelevant.

The Magpul P-mag is the ultimate AR magazine, period.

Posted by: Wes at December 5, 2008 10:55 AM


And I'm sorry but "GI issue only" ALWAYS rubs me the wrong way. Thats just another form of "elitism". I guess Tangodown belives that us grubby civilians arn't worthy of the neat bells and wistles the military gets...guess they arn't worthy of my dollars either.

Posted by: coolhand77 at December 5, 2008 08:14 AM


Hmmm, how are you supposed to get crap out of the mag if the floor plate doesn't come off? Sure, you can spray it out, but what happens if a spring breaks, or a follower, or something gets jammed in there?
A dust seal? Thats their answer to the dirt fouling problem? What happens during a mag swap when you have to break the seal?
If they are so worried, about that, why not just take a P-mag (or any other mag) and retrofit it with a silicon seal...cheap fix. How much to the wunder-mags cost? (not to be confused with the $60 HK "Uber-mag).
AND you have to get new mag pouches?
riiiight.
nice idea, poor execution.

Posted by: coolhand77 at December 5, 2008 08:07 AM


Good Evening Folks,

Magazines have been a problem for the AR's since the beginning in 1965 and remains so today. Test these puppies harshly and if in fact a 20 rounder will hold 20 rounds and a 30 rounder will hold 30 rounds and not occur a stoppage or jam, buy 'em and in large quantities.

This is a no fu**in' brainer.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at December 4, 2008 10:17 PM


Wow, talk about a waste. They couldn't just adopt the already proven Magpul Pmags? Oh wait I forgot, that is too convienent and logical.

Posted by: Patriot93 at December 4, 2008 06:26 PM


Frankyly, I'm not impressed. Magpul Pmags? THOSE are impressive.

Pmag vs a truck: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCFXcOOb4jc

Pmag vs a bullet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAUFHEJFf-E

I love these mags. Not only are they tough and reliable, but they're also customizable. Some have windows that allow the shooter to gauge how much ammunition they've got left (though to most, this is more of a "gee-whiz" feature).

All Pmags also have the option to slide in a "Ranger plate" to the bottom in order to facilitate pulling the mag out of a pouch.

You can read about them more here: http://www.oa2.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5581

Posted by: JRS at December 4, 2008 04:53 PM


Quite frankly there isn't any call for it. Please remember that the Soldier's basic load remains 210 rounds. Increased magazine capacity means a decrease in the shooters ability to properly wield the weapon. Additionally, previous attempts at ultra high capacity magazines (C-mag) has shown poor results.

Posted by: Soldier Systems at December 4, 2008 04:44 PM


Why don't they make mags with an increased ammo capacity?

Any answers would be appreciated.

Posted by: 6.8 SPC at December 4, 2008 03:54 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.